Being reported by Natural News:
"It has now been revealed that the US military ran the entire operation to sink the Russian military ship, Moskva, including running the tracking of the ship via a P-8 Poseidon surveillance aircraft, which then handed off fire solutions to the Ukrainians who were all trained by the US military as well. Thus, the United States provided the weapons, the training, the tracking and the fire solution to sink the Moskva."
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
One of the worst purveyors of clickbait and flat out unscientific trash. I truly dislike that site almost as much as I hate Gateway Pundit. There is a real problem within conservative media. It's all new media. We don't have people who have the classical training in journalism to know how to properly dig on a story and verify their sources before reporting. Even some of the most basic things, they don't do. They'll write whole stories based off of some Tweet or some out of context phrase from some long-ass document. It's just "content" slapped on their websites for views so they can make money off of the movement.
They're not careful and they produce and echo a lot of fake news, and it really makes us look like a bunch of uneducated idiots repeating this stuff.
The OP here didn't even bother to link to the story let alone to any objective source. Dug. Found it: here. The story literally starts with a conspiracy theory, and echoes someone else's reporting, citing the UK Daily Mail here. So, go to their story and they're citing "The Times." Which Times? The London Times? The New York Times? Some other Times? Who knows. They don't clarify or link. I'm assuming it's this paywalled article from The Times (UK).
So what we have in an uncited reference to an echo of an echo of a paywalled article from a source which appears to be distinctly anti-Republican, anti-Putin, pro-globalist, pro-Ukraine. I can't evaluate the reporting itself, because paywall. The point is that this is all work that should've been done by the author of the article, but NN and TGP are too fricking lazy to do the 5 minutes' worth of work I just did.
In other words, perfect material to post on GAW and have everyone run with it.
So what I’m hearing is you love Mike Adams.
Thank you, I always have to prove my source before believing anything these days and the first thing I do is look for the article.
You are the best.