No such thing as real perpetual motion. Splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen uses more energy than you get back when they recombine. It's a proven losing battle.
Sounds like a dupont response. There have been quite a few water engines created that work, so someone is lying and my money is on the scientific community.
Not DuPont, but actual science. It takes more energy to split water than you get back. There are losses in every process. In the physical world, it's called friction, and air resistance, and heat loss. You have to keep adding energy from somewhere else.
In the case of nuclear energy, the energy was added to the radioactive elements at the point of creation. In the case of wind and hydroelectric power, the energy is added by the sun.
That "plenty of people" you cite don't exist, and you can't prove otherwise. There has never been one of those engines shown to work without added energy from somewhere. Some people are very clever at hiding the source of the added energy, but a careful examination shows. The problem is that the ones you know about probably never submitted their engine to a thorough examination by competent people.
In short, you are absolutely wrong about having an engine that you can run from the water hose.
Stanley Meyer made multiple working engines using water fuel cells. Mainstream science isn't going to tell you anything that can free you from our enslavers. All science is controlled.
No such thing as real perpetual motion. Splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen uses more energy than you get back when they recombine. It's a proven losing battle.
Sounds like a dupont response. There have been quite a few water engines created that work, so someone is lying and my money is on the scientific community.
Not DuPont, but actual science. It takes more energy to split water than you get back. There are losses in every process. In the physical world, it's called friction, and air resistance, and heat loss. You have to keep adding energy from somewhere else.
In the case of nuclear energy, the energy was added to the radioactive elements at the point of creation. In the case of wind and hydroelectric power, the energy is added by the sun.
That "plenty of people" you cite don't exist, and you can't prove otherwise. There has never been one of those engines shown to work without added energy from somewhere. Some people are very clever at hiding the source of the added energy, but a careful examination shows. The problem is that the ones you know about probably never submitted their engine to a thorough examination by competent people.
In short, you are absolutely wrong about having an engine that you can run from the water hose.
Stanley Meyer made multiple working engines using water fuel cells. Mainstream science isn't going to tell you anything that can free you from our enslavers. All science is controlled.
A fuel cell does not equate to filling your car up from the garden hose. Energy is added somewhere.