Jesus. Ok distilling water from your hose and then putting it in your fuel cell. Better? The whole idea of nuclear is retarded. And electric cars are not the future unless they come up with an alternative to batteries.
A fuel cell is powered by hydrogen in a tank that has to be refilled. That hydrogen requires a lot of energy to be separated from water and compressed for storage. In the car, the fuel cell has a membrane with hydrogen on one side and oxygen from the air on the other. Charged hydrogen ions of one charge can go through the membrane, but the other charge is forced to go through the wires and power the car. The waste product is water.
You don't put water into a fuel cell. You get water out of it.
You didn't look into Stanley Meyer at all did you. His engine ran off of any kind of water, including salt water. He didn't use the electrolysis method of creating hydrogen from the water. I don't know how he did it but it was apparently effective enough for the oil companies to kill him.
So 1 guy that I know of did what you say isn't possible, and ive heard of others but i dont remember their names as it was years ago I looked into this. Stanley was just the name i remembered because one of my friends had the same first and last name.
Sorry if I dont believe you regardless of how well spoken you are. As I said before every single field of science is corrupt. Most scientists are spineless. Or they aren't as smart as you think, they just memorize complex math formulas and don't actually know how to come up with an original idea or critically think. We see this in every field. Our Rockefeller funded education system (since 1913) isn't designed for free thinkers, it's designed for good little workers who follow directions.
I have studied science for over 50 years and know how the world works. If you don't know how Meyer did what he did, then he bamboozled you, along with hundreds of others. Charlatans are out there every year preying on those who have a poor understanding of the sciences. Many people believed Uri Geller was bending spoons with his mind. I have actually corresponded with the Amazing Randi about the gullible people in the world.
No offense but plenty of people involved in science know what they read in books and THINK that it's fact. the fact that you think the science is settled and there is no other way shows your level of indoctrination. Science is never settled. Only natural laws are absolute so I suggest you go back and learn some more.
You probably think the world is a spinning ball too but I can scientifically prove to you that's not possible, nor does it reflect reality, but your cognitive dissonance would probably get in the way of understanding.
Don't bother responding, as I've already came to the conclusion you're just another lame brain that is so heavily indoctrinated by the Rockefeller funded textbook books you don't have much of a chance.
Jesus. Ok distilling water from your hose and then putting it in your fuel cell. Better? The whole idea of nuclear is retarded. And electric cars are not the future unless they come up with an alternative to batteries.
A fuel cell is powered by hydrogen in a tank that has to be refilled. That hydrogen requires a lot of energy to be separated from water and compressed for storage. In the car, the fuel cell has a membrane with hydrogen on one side and oxygen from the air on the other. Charged hydrogen ions of one charge can go through the membrane, but the other charge is forced to go through the wires and power the car. The waste product is water.
You don't put water into a fuel cell. You get water out of it.
You didn't look into Stanley Meyer at all did you. His engine ran off of any kind of water, including salt water. He didn't use the electrolysis method of creating hydrogen from the water. I don't know how he did it but it was apparently effective enough for the oil companies to kill him.
So 1 guy that I know of did what you say isn't possible, and ive heard of others but i dont remember their names as it was years ago I looked into this. Stanley was just the name i remembered because one of my friends had the same first and last name.
Sorry if I dont believe you regardless of how well spoken you are. As I said before every single field of science is corrupt. Most scientists are spineless. Or they aren't as smart as you think, they just memorize complex math formulas and don't actually know how to come up with an original idea or critically think. We see this in every field. Our Rockefeller funded education system (since 1913) isn't designed for free thinkers, it's designed for good little workers who follow directions.
I have studied science for over 50 years and know how the world works. If you don't know how Meyer did what he did, then he bamboozled you, along with hundreds of others. Charlatans are out there every year preying on those who have a poor understanding of the sciences. Many people believed Uri Geller was bending spoons with his mind. I have actually corresponded with the Amazing Randi about the gullible people in the world.
No offense but plenty of people involved in science know what they read in books and THINK that it's fact. the fact that you think the science is settled and there is no other way shows your level of indoctrination. Science is never settled. Only natural laws are absolute so I suggest you go back and learn some more.
You probably think the world is a spinning ball too but I can scientifically prove to you that's not possible, nor does it reflect reality, but your cognitive dissonance would probably get in the way of understanding.
Don't bother responding, as I've already came to the conclusion you're just another lame brain that is so heavily indoctrinated by the Rockefeller funded textbook books you don't have much of a chance.