53% is pretty much the average mortality rate of Ebola (source: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=ebola+mortality+rate), so what the study actually shows is that Remdesivir is ineffective against Ebola, not that Remdesivir has a 53% mortality rate. It is Ebola that has a 53% mortality rate, and that mortality rate is apparently unaffected by Remdesivir.
Not doubting it, but what is the source for the 53%?
53% is pretty much the average mortality rate of Ebola (source: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=ebola+mortality+rate), so what the study actually shows is that Remdesivir is ineffective against Ebola, not that Remdesivir has a 53% mortality rate. It is Ebola that has a 53% mortality rate, and that mortality rate is apparently unaffected by Remdesivir.
It's 50% across the board, and 50% with Remdesivir, what does that indicate about the influence Remdesivir has on the mortality rate?