The miners dictate which fork will be the winning one. See Bitcoin "core" vs "cash", Bcash did have a potentially good solution to scaling, miners disagree because they would get paid less. The result, a fork where a few users went over to Bcash and most stayed with core where the miners are.
Not only does miners provide security in a proof of work network, but if you're on a fork using the same algorithm as the original, that's a pretty big attack vector. One large miner could easily launch a 51% attack on Bcash due to it's low hashrate compared to core.
If WEF where to create their own version of Bitcoin it would be the same thing, sure they could easily do that, but no miner would support it and no sane user would trust WEF who's "solution" is most likely to just centralize it all and put themselves in charge, "for the environment" of course. 🤡
The miners dictate which fork will be the winning one. See Bitcoin "core" vs "cash", Bcash did have a potentially good solution to scaling, miners disagree because they would get paid less. The result, a fork where a few users went over to Bcash and most stayed with core where the miners are.
Not only does miners provide security in a proof of work network, but if you're on a fork using the same algorithm as the original, that's a pretty big attack vector. One large miner could easily launch a 51% attack on Bcash due to it's low hashrate compared to core.
If WEF where to create their own version of Bitcoin it would be the same thing, sure they could easily do that, but no miner would support it and no sane user would trust WEF who's "solution" is most likely to just centralize it all and put themselves in charge, "for the environment" of course. 🤡