Hear me out here, we KNOW they lie about literally everything to push their narratives and agendas. We know they will fabricate studies, evidence, polls, surveys, etc. etc. using manipulated statistics and language in order to produce "evidence" that fits their pre determined narrative. So with that in mind, are we even sure there are as many people as they say there are? And as far as that goes, are we even sure that racial and demographic statistics are accurate?
Think about the whole "The white population is decreasing" narrative they've been pushing the past few years. or "Christianity is a dying religion" etc. etc. There's dozens of ways to prove those two particular narratives are a lie and the exact opposite is true, even with their obviously manipulated statistics, but the point I'm trying to make is, what if this is JUST LIKE the voter fraud?
Atlanta (Fulton County) has now more or less been proven to have a fraud rate (Fake votes, vote switching, illegal votes, etc.) of 79%. When you look at every other area where evidence has surfaced with numbers to back it up, it's usually in the 60-70% range with 80% being on the ultra high end.
So who's to say that all of organizations responsible for demographic statistics are manipulating the true numbers as well? For decades now, most people have theorized and it's become generally accepted that China lies about their demographics and pumps up their population numbers to an absurd degree (When you dig into it, there's probably only about 450-600 Million people in China in reality). So is it really that hard to believe all of our compromised governments are doing the same thing?
Who's to say there aren't a Billion Americans (Probably an exaggeration) but they intentionally undercount the population of rural areas and red states because then their population centers would have their power diluted to an extent they can no longer effectively cheat like they have been?
Who's to say that we aren't still a WASP super majority nation to the tune of 80-90% but they manipulate the statistics to overrepresent every other demographic while intentionally undercounting the WASP demographic?
And it's not just the USA, this applies to EVERY western Nation. Look at Europe? Yes I know there's a lot of muslim "refugees" that have basically bred like rabbits the last couple decades all over Europe, but applying this same logic to Europe, it's entirely possible that the muslim "refugee" demographic is being intentionally overcounted and overrepresented while the actual European demographic is being undercounted to make it seem like there's a muslim takeover.
Same thing with Australia and Canada. Heck, for all we know, the world population may be 10 or 20 billion. The reverse could also be true. We could have LESS people than we've been led to believe across the board and all of these non white demographics are being overcounted and overrepresented. Population centers are being given credit for people that don't exist, thus manipulating their political power and influence.
That scenario seems particularly likely when you actually look at voting patterns. Look at NYC. It "officially" has a population of 8 million people. Yet, the highest ever turnout (2020), only saw a little over 2 million people vote. So a little over 25% of the population actually voted. I grant you that doesn't account for felons, underage people, etc. But the point still stands. You have these MASSIVE cities that usually have less than 30% of their population actually involved in the electoral process.
Considering everything we know, that's rather suspicious. I'm not saying any of this is 100% confirmed, but it's a theory I've developed and figured I'd share. Let everyone discuss it.
You might be onto something, OP. Look at China, India and the US from 1950 to present with their population explosions. All have tripled since 1950 yet in China there had been a "one baby per family" for decades, plus female infanticide, so how did they grow exponentionally during those years? In America, go into the hinterlands and you will see a small increase of new faces in those areas. No babies being produced more rapidly as the old folks die off. Maybe old folks are living longer? Your last paragraph is on point with so few people voting in densely populated cities. Something smells off. I wonder if the MSM will ever do an expose on that FACT?
It’s hard to believe people are living longer. My grandmothers passed at 67/70 and my grandfathers at 61/65. All of those are below the average life expectancy in 1950–and way lower than what’s published (falsely) today.