Hear me out here, we KNOW they lie about literally everything to push their narratives and agendas. We know they will fabricate studies, evidence, polls, surveys, etc. etc. using manipulated statistics and language in order to produce "evidence" that fits their pre determined narrative. So with that in mind, are we even sure there are as many people as they say there are? And as far as that goes, are we even sure that racial and demographic statistics are accurate?
Think about the whole "The white population is decreasing" narrative they've been pushing the past few years. or "Christianity is a dying religion" etc. etc. There's dozens of ways to prove those two particular narratives are a lie and the exact opposite is true, even with their obviously manipulated statistics, but the point I'm trying to make is, what if this is JUST LIKE the voter fraud?
Atlanta (Fulton County) has now more or less been proven to have a fraud rate (Fake votes, vote switching, illegal votes, etc.) of 79%. When you look at every other area where evidence has surfaced with numbers to back it up, it's usually in the 60-70% range with 80% being on the ultra high end.
So who's to say that all of organizations responsible for demographic statistics are manipulating the true numbers as well? For decades now, most people have theorized and it's become generally accepted that China lies about their demographics and pumps up their population numbers to an absurd degree (When you dig into it, there's probably only about 450-600 Million people in China in reality). So is it really that hard to believe all of our compromised governments are doing the same thing?
Who's to say there aren't a Billion Americans (Probably an exaggeration) but they intentionally undercount the population of rural areas and red states because then their population centers would have their power diluted to an extent they can no longer effectively cheat like they have been?
Who's to say that we aren't still a WASP super majority nation to the tune of 80-90% but they manipulate the statistics to overrepresent every other demographic while intentionally undercounting the WASP demographic?
And it's not just the USA, this applies to EVERY western Nation. Look at Europe? Yes I know there's a lot of muslim "refugees" that have basically bred like rabbits the last couple decades all over Europe, but applying this same logic to Europe, it's entirely possible that the muslim "refugee" demographic is being intentionally overcounted and overrepresented while the actual European demographic is being undercounted to make it seem like there's a muslim takeover.
Same thing with Australia and Canada. Heck, for all we know, the world population may be 10 or 20 billion. The reverse could also be true. We could have LESS people than we've been led to believe across the board and all of these non white demographics are being overcounted and overrepresented. Population centers are being given credit for people that don't exist, thus manipulating their political power and influence.
That scenario seems particularly likely when you actually look at voting patterns. Look at NYC. It "officially" has a population of 8 million people. Yet, the highest ever turnout (2020), only saw a little over 2 million people vote. So a little over 25% of the population actually voted. I grant you that doesn't account for felons, underage people, etc. But the point still stands. You have these MASSIVE cities that usually have less than 30% of their population actually involved in the electoral process.
Considering everything we know, that's rather suspicious. I'm not saying any of this is 100% confirmed, but it's a theory I've developed and figured I'd share. Let everyone discuss it.
That's according to "official" statistics, which is the entire point I'm trying to make. That numbers like that are possibly being manipulated to force a narrative that's favorable to the cabal.
It's a two pronged attack. It works as both a demoralization campaign against the people they hate the most (Western Whites), and allows them to manipulate statistics and narratives so that there's less suspicion when they cheat in elections and slowly take over the governments of entire nations over the course of a few decades.
Heck, look at France the other day. France is a PRIME example of what I'm getting at. Plenty of Arab and muslim "refugees", supposedly absurdly liberal and woke nation, and as you said the "official" narrative is that the white French population is ever decreasing.
Yet, the macaroni globalist pawn actually lost the election and had to steal it in the exact same manner they did here in the USA. If France was actually overrun with woke morons and muslim invaders outnumbered the based Frenchmen (who would mostly be white) then there's no way that would be required.
You have to look at this stuff from a 40K foot picture anymore. Nothing is surface level at this point in the game.
You say that, but I think it can, and probably is off by quite a lot. Part of the global decrease of white as a percent of the population argument is less that whites are decreasing, and more that certain third world/developing nations are growing at hyper speed. Latin/South America and Africa are where most of this is occurring. As I pointed out, you can already discount the majority of that in Latin/South America, so really the only Growth that would effect those stats is coming out of Africa.
So now ask yourself, do you really trust the "official" demographics of a bunch of third world nations where the majority of people still live in literal mud huts or they have literal war lords controlling large portions of the nations where they can't even accurately count the population?
Technically, that's true of a lot of Latin/South American nations as well if you want to REALLY get into the nitty gritty of it.
Though I do agree, the cabal isn't going to stop until they're forced to when they're finally defeated once and for all. Which as I said, it seems like a precedent is already being set by the UK to deport all of these people and their descendants, either back to where they came from, or to some random nation on the continent they came from.
Combine that with Trump's comments while he was still "officially" President about retroactively revoking the citizenship of anchor babies and "refugees" and deporting all illegals/refugees and their descendants and I'm not too worried about it. It's not going to be fixed over night, but I have confidence that we'll be able to fix the majority of this globalist mess before the decade is up.
Mass deportation isn't exactly hard. Look up Operation Wetback. We've have mass deportations before, and we can easily turn that up to 11 and take an even more aggressive approach to get things done sooner once we clean up our governments and overthrow the cabal.
Well I'm sure it would get violent at some point, but a large part of Operation Wetback was literally making life a living hell for illegal immigrants. Cut them off from every possible state sponsored program, make it impossible for them to work (Usually by making use of harsh punishments to employers for employing them), make it impossible for them to own property or rent a house/apartment.
Literally make it impossible for them to live in this country. That alone will drive out several million a year. I'm sure that there will be SOME violence involved. There always is, but it can't possibly be worse than the literal gang warfare going on in most border states at the moment.
As for mixed race kids, I'm of the opinion that if one of their parents is a legal citizen and the other is an illegal/"refugee" that kid shouldn't' be allowed citizenship. It's not exactly right to deport them, since technically one of their parents IS American. But I wouldn't shed any tears if that was the solution decided on.
Now having said that, in such cases I personally would take the route of revoking their citizenship BUT also granting them permanent residency (Which IS a thing). The couldn't vote and would have to jump through a few more loops to do things like buy guns, but they could still continue their lives as they currently are. And if the right to vote is incredibly important to them, they can always apply for actual citizenship and go through the process like everyone else. Heck, they'd even technically have a head start since they could skip over the "Live here 7 years" part of the naturalization process.
Honestly, this isn't some super hard question with no solution. There's a VERY clear path going forward to fix most of this almost immediately. People just generally get emotional and forget that there are multiple classifications beyond Citizen/Non-Citizen and that mass deportations have been conducted in the past successfully.
All we need is a government willing to actually enforce the law, and officials with enough spine to make sure it's actually done right. That way you can't have certain places decide they're not going to comply (sanctuary cities). It's as simple as cutting off funding. You cut off all federal and state funding to say, LA, for even a week and the entire city would collapse. At that point that don't have a choice but to comply and start enforcing anti-immigration laws.
Oh and neat little tidbit of info, since it seems relevant and I already mentioned something not really widespread and known about Hispanics. Did you know that until the 90's, muslims weren't allowed to hold office and their immigration into the US was mostly limited to temporary immigrants via green cards? Yup, we basically had a long standing ban on muslims. Guess who lifted that ban and changed the laws that governed how to handle muslims. Not the supreme court. H.W. Bush did it. So it's entirely likely we'll go back to that standard and literally revoke the citizenship of every muslim in the nation and deport them when this all over.