Do not be quick to jump on the #MinistryOfTruth narrative.
Consider the following plausible deniability.
Majestic Message of Disclosure.
Enjoy.
This goes two ways.
[Resident Biden] = [President Trump]
When [Biden] + Ministry of Truth
When Ministry of Truth + ]President Trump[
What happens when Clinton Foundation news shatters the State Department?
How will the Mainstream Media be controlled to cooperate under a Ministry of Truth that [they] are ushering in.
The End Game Started Today.
Enjoy The Show.
We Chose Her For A Reason.
Think Harry Potter.
Majestic Magick.
You Are Watching Actors.
Within Each IS-BE Is The Potential For Greatness.
Even Those Who Ask "Who Do I Have To Fuck To Get Rich Powerful and Famous"
Hunter Biden?
And Many others?
How many others?
Disney In The News?
Signing Like Disney?
What Is About To Break Open?
Why Is A Ministry Of Truth Necessary?
[They] are going to use it to publish propaganda.
What happens when [THEY] occurs?
How do you inform those who do not consume political news?
Do you need actors?
Do you need people who can sing about how horrible these people truly are?
Will it help soften the blow?
Pun Intended.
MJ12
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
You’re one of my favorite posters, bubble, but here I disagree. I don’t interpret the facts on the ground as evidence that white hats are determining everything the enemy does.
This is a war. War is all about adaptation to the realities of the battlefield.
I fully agree that white hats have “shaped” the battlefield. Scott Ritter discussed this concept in analyzing the Russian advances in Ukraine. It’s similar to chess strategy where your primary objective is to gain “control of the board.”
Control of the board or shaping the battlefield both force moves and limit effectiveness of your opponent. It allows you more latitude to counter or use the opponents moves against them.
But it doesn’t predict or contain everything your opponent does. It just makes it less likely - or impossible, for him to succeed.
That doesn’t mean he can’t land blows, inflict real harm, and cause extensive damage. The cornered animal is the most dangerous, and the threat is great.
Ukraine is an example. Do you think the deep state will not use nukes because “white hats are in control”? The deep state is going scorched earth. It’s not a matter of “if” they’ll use nukes but “how” they can get away with it with plausible deniability.
White hats are countering a deeply entrenched, longstanding global operation. There’s clearly many aspects that are still not in white hat hands, even when Trump was in office:
Vaccine agenda.
Geoengineering.
Federal reserve.
Food production.
Arms distribution.
Trump temporarily contained some of this and White hats are still mitigating or limiting — forcing them to make mistakes, miscalculate, expose their hand. That’s what is meant by Patriots in Control. It does not mean that everything the psychopaths do is a good move for white hats, intentional and part of the plan.
Consider Quantum Computing (infinitely faster than traditional), Aritificial Intelligence, and remote viewing technology (looking glass) in the classified sector. 40 years ahead of consumer? Was the outcome already set before it began? Are minor adjustments needed occasionally? What does trust the plan mean?
Why did Q point us in the direction of MJ12 twice? Did MJ12 predate Q? What comes next?
Quantum computers are only as fast as their slowest component, its very good for humongous number crunching but that's all.
why is every super power in the world pouring enormous funding into advancing quantum computing if that's all its good for? what is your opinion on military tech superseding consumer by 30+ years? Does the Department of Energy have a quantum computer? Who issues Q clearance? What does Q stand for?
My understanding of Q is that Q was a significant contributor to the Gospels, and a backroom guy in James Bond Movies
My opinion of military spending is based on my 10 years in the Navy.
Porkbarrel politics, insane requirement specifications, idiot officers with overweening ambitions and degrees in "killer" powerpoint presentations trying to secure nice juicy funds for a procurement that will never see operational use and get one (or ten) over the other services. The jealousy and infighting between the various branches of the military is beyond description and only equally by the infighting between the intelligence agencies.
Quantum computing is a major buzzword in this struggle for funding, congress and others seem to be transfixed by buzzwords coming from the military, they military exploit this as they always have done and still do.