If our desire to avoid so-called ‘baseless pseudoscience’ is as casual as we imply;
casual to such an extent so as to justify our complete disinterest in it as a species,
then why is our knowledge of specifically what is forbidden-to-study, so damned accurate and thorough?
If it is all worthless fodder, then why are its opponents so well organized, trained and armed?
This is Sherlock Holmes’ proverbial, ‘Dog that didn’t bark.’
Think: Conspiracy theory.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/03/07/nelsonian-inference-and-cultivated-ignorance/