You have to ask yourself who leaked it and for what purpose. Given the way this supposedly leaked ruling supposedly goes it's pretty obvious it is meant to whip up the party of perpetual outrage to try and apply pressure to get that ruling changed or delayed in some manner or galvanize a legislative or electoral response.
You have to ask yourself who leaked it and for what purpose. Given the way this supposedly leaked ruling supposedly goes it's pretty obvious it is meant to whip up the party of perpetual outrage to try and apply pressure to get that ruling changed or delayed in some manner or galvanize a legislative or electoral response.
☝️FF, This only proves the DS runs the SC...
And the leftist media lapmutts