I saw a premier of "2000 Mules" on 5/2 with a dozen people in my local patriot posse. Despite D'Souza having great intentions, the man is simply a lousy film-maker. I've seen all his movies and none of them have impressed me. "2000 Mules" is no different, despite hoping for a better movie this time around since it was such compelling subject matter.
Sadly, I give this film an "EPIC fail" rating. And at $20 per ticket, nobody on earth is going to see it besides die-hard Trump supporters who already know that the 2020 election was stolen. The vast majority of this film is people sitting around talking to one another - not showing the DATA and EVIDENCE (which was SUPPOSED to be the entire point of the movie).
There's precious little evidence shown in the whole movie beyond what's already revealed in the teaser trailers. Some of the ballot-stuffer mule video footage even looked like 're-enactments' because of the numerous camera angles and edits - instead of legit footage (and it's not even spelled out that it's a re-enactment - which hurts the credibility of the real footage shown). Very, very disappointed - although not at all surprised.
After the movie, our dozen patriots hung out in the lobby and discussed the movie. All of us were in complete agreement that this movie is a colossal missed opportunity. And even worse, with so much hype about it, expectations are likely even higher - and it doesn't deliver. At all. IMO, save your money.
Well I thought it was a documentary and not movie...so why judge it as a movie. It is assumed that the documentary is to enlighten the viewer to the mechanics of the steal...does it do that? I don't know I've yet to see it. If 2000Mules achieves the goal of informing how the steal happened then that is all it was supposed to do. Some Documentary's are "drier" then others providing the facts without the "flash". The people talking here are there to be listened to which I look forward hearing them out. Does it lack the jump cutting MTV era production standards and make it boring for you visually? As for the multiple angles you got to consider that the election was a sting and problems were expected and the drop boxes were turned into a trap. I understand that one drop in Yuma Az had six different cameras on it, I can not speak to the other drop boxes but I have known about the problems with Yuma drop box for some time.
As to the claim he's was a lousy film maker who knows but as a documentarian his work has lead to Obama railroading him for a 5yr prison sentence.
I guess if your going to call 2000Mules and any other work Dinesh has done a bad movie then so be it...but it's documentary and if it educates more then it entertains then the film achieves it's goal.
I did it have to be entertaining? Did the fact that you weren't entertained cloud your judgement? I suppose I'll have to watch it. But I never had an expectation to be entertained like some I guess.
Well if it's a documentary it should have openly stated that scene was a re-enactment (at least in the beginning credits). I agree with him. And who wants to pay to watch ppl sit and talk, and give no documented evidence? We can do that right here and elsewhere and pay nothing.
Thank you for saying that. To be clear though, I said in my OP that the opening mule scene in the movie "even looked like a re-enactment." I don't have 100% proof of that, nor did I claim to - I said that it LOOKED like a re-enactment. That's because of there being so many camera angles and edits in it - which made it suspicious - unlike the static camera angle footage of other mule drops shown. The guy sitting next to me at the theater blurted out loud, "That's a re-enactment. Is that even real footage?" before I did, and he has no background in movies or editing at all - it was that obvious and suspicious to us.
It's not if it's a documentary because it is...if it's an reenactment in opening credit's you object to, then you might have a problem with every third program on the History channel as well. Or not.
Two things are true however....
One...Every theater is sold out...so it appears plenty of people want see it
Two...(They) don't want to talk about it at all as they are too busy ignoring it to scream at the Supremes'...most likely by design.
We however have it all. The Normies however are just starting to play catch up. This documentary is part of the painful drip drip drip of information that the Cabal fears. Given the Cabals reactions Dinesh is achieving his goal. As for a lack of hard evidence right now ....question...have you heard of any mules being arrested? I haven't. I have read about others caught up in election fraud cases in 10 states but nothing about these mules being arrested...yet. I expect much of the smoking gun evidence you crave is being withheld for the mules future arrests. The legal proper chain of evidence that our courts rely on to convict someone can't be undone for a documentary.
The crime in question has no statute of limitation...and there is no need to show all of our hole cards yet.
But given the reactions I have seen to 2000 mules the documentary it does get the ball rolling and maybe that was all it was ever to do.
Well that's so true, all you said. I didn't like all the flack this patriot got for his review. What has happend to us??
It’s going to show the Democrats the flaws they need to patch up for this next election.
Good thing so many states won't be using a drop boxes next election there is nothing to prefect if they aren't used at all. So they'll know what did wrong but they won't be able to fix it in 23 states alone and more going forward so there is that. 😁
You DO realize that DOCUMENTARY is a CATEGORY of MOVIES.
They are NOT parallel, they are nested.
I think you got the message I was conveying overall...got any other concerns or do you just want to split hairs like I do? 🙃 But just one note from history Dinesh was once snubbed for an Oscar for the 2016 documentary guess what the name of one of the documentary's the academy nominated over his...I shit you not...
This is Not a Film
Hehehe sorry it makes me giggle.