So I believe the reference to stonecutting being specifically called out is more than what I know, but I believe this plays a roll.
We pay for most of our services in life. Utilities, Travel, Entertainment, Leisure, and a lot of that funds the cabal. What don't we "pay" for that "funds" the cabal? Social Media, Search Engines. Websites that have nothing to sell you, yet you can utilize their resources.
The question you must ask yourself is (not only, if there's no product, what is the product?) To whom are you trusting that information with? The dot win communities ought to be under the same level of scrutiny.
The dot win communities ought to be under the same level of scrutiny.
Yep, and we still have NO clue who created this site. Remember the drama that seemed to spring out of nowhere with patriots.win changing to thedonald.win
I think it's about social media companies, and those who created them (like jack). Biggest mistake was making it free. This opened the flood gates to all the problems we have today. These services were hijacked by activists to carry out political agendas and manipulate the public square to make it look like they had more support from the public than they actually did. The censoring, the shadow-banning, and all other forms of fuckery wouldn't have been possible if account holders were paying customers.
I think the companies were corrupt to begin with; many were started by DARPA themselves and others probably by former DARPA employees (or their children). It is the very reason why the internet was put out to the public and the sites free to access and made to be very addictive. They even used Pavlov's Law to keep us hooked with "likes", "retweets", "friends", and anything similar showing positive feedback (even if numbers were fudged with bots)
The patent system is owned by the cabal. HRC herself is a patent lawyer who worked with James Chandler (IBM), another darpa creation like intel, to manage all the patents in the world.
So I believe the reference to stonecutting being specifically called out is more than what I know, but I believe this plays a roll.
We pay for most of our services in life. Utilities, Travel, Entertainment, Leisure, and a lot of that funds the cabal. What don't we "pay" for that "funds" the cabal? Social Media, Search Engines. Websites that have nothing to sell you, yet you can utilize their resources.
The question you must ask yourself is (not only, if there's no product, what is the product?) To whom are you trusting that information with? The dot win communities ought to be under the same level of scrutiny.
Yep, and we still have NO clue who created this site. Remember the drama that seemed to spring out of nowhere with patriots.win changing to thedonald.win
I think it's about social media companies, and those who created them (like jack). Biggest mistake was making it free. This opened the flood gates to all the problems we have today. These services were hijacked by activists to carry out political agendas and manipulate the public square to make it look like they had more support from the public than they actually did. The censoring, the shadow-banning, and all other forms of fuckery wouldn't have been possible if account holders were paying customers.
I think the companies were corrupt to begin with; many were started by DARPA themselves and others probably by former DARPA employees (or their children). It is the very reason why the internet was put out to the public and the sites free to access and made to be very addictive. They even used Pavlov's Law to keep us hooked with "likes", "retweets", "friends", and anything similar showing positive feedback (even if numbers were fudged with bots)
The patent system is owned by the cabal. HRC herself is a patent lawyer who worked with James Chandler (IBM), another darpa creation like intel, to manage all the patents in the world.
hence why he wants to charge for tweeting....or for premium account services....that is what he will do.