It does but not for the reason you think, higher IQ people make more and more abstract laws that have a good reason to exist, but low IQ people genuinely cannot perceive the law's purpose in the abstract, if that's the case then to what extent is it a lawful law for the person?

Here's a half related example.

How it is:

Be Black - Act differently - Be treated differently

How many blacks see it:

Be Black - Be treated differently

These two things are not the same, but insofar as the black person is concerned in handling it, they will in fact be the same. Imagine being white and being told you were "acting" white and that's why you're being arrested. The left have a point with all this "systemic" stuff, it is in fact systemically "white" by design, it is in fact geared towards an ethnocentric culture, same as any other country on Earth. You do not expect to see governmental forms in Madagascar to be available in Italian - why? Because they have an ethnocentric culture, what we used to call "our way of life".

Third world countries have laws that basically go like this:

If you want to claim your goat you have to defend your goat, if you do not defend your goat then you do not want it and so it is now someone elses'

This is where male chaperoning etc comes into it, if that woman didn't want to be raped and stolen for a wife then whatever man in charge of her should have been guarding her. If your store items were important to you you should have put them all behind plexiglass.

Low IQ people really only deal with an external locus of morality, like, if I steal this thing then I will be whipped or beaten and I do not want that.

High IQ people deal in internal locus of morality. I would not like to be raped or stolen from, therefore I would not do that to someone else.