Well, I have no idea. I'm not a doctor. I've seen clots, and that is definitely a clot, but that's all I can say with certainty.
I've run across this video before. The man who filmed it, Richard Hirschman, is NOT a doctor. He's an embalmer. He's not a medical expert and can't diagnose anything. He is not a pathologist who establishes cause of death.
His only job is to prepare bodies for funerals.
What he can say with confidence is that he is pulling out an unusual number of clots from the bodies he works on.
What he CANNOT say is that these clots happened because of the vaccine. He has no way to know or prove that.
In fact, since the vaccination status of dead bodies is not really useful info for an embalmer, I'm not entirely certain how Hirschman would know or prove the vaccination status of any of these bodies.
So why all the new clots?
Well, probably because COVID-19 is well-known to cause microdamage in vessels, which can lead to clotting problems. Blood clots are a known and established side-effect of COVID-19 infection.
So with videos like this, what can I say is probably true?
Richard Hirschman is probably an embalmer, based on outside sources.
Hirschman probably did pull out that clot from a real dead body.
Hirschman probably is seeing more clots than he's used to seeing in usual places (although I'd like to see hard data that "over half" of his bodies are showing these clots).
What do I have to assume here to reach your conclusion?
That the body he's working on is vaccinated. There is no proof of this, and it's literally the only detail that supports his argument.
If the body was vaccinated, that the person had never gotten COVID-19 (which would explain clotting damage), either before or despite the vaccine.
That unvaccinated bodies are not showing the same signs of clots (the research I've seen suggests otherwise).
That Hirschman actually does even know the vaccination status of any of the bodies he's working on (again, I'm not sure why, and he'd need to document this for it to be credible).
So if I make absolutely no assumptions, what does this video actually prove?
That an embalmer pulled a long clot out of a body, and he thought it was weird.
That's all I can really get from this, because that's all the video directly provides. Anything else, including the vaccination status of the body, is just an assumption.
Well, that conclusion requires other conclusions about the vaccine that I don't necessarily agree with, but would require more energy and motivation to debate it than I have today. :)
I can say that the video on its own is likely to scare people who believe the vaccine is dangerous, and utterly unconvincing to those who believe otherwise.
That's not a slight against you. That's just the nature of this particular evidence. It's of a non-medical-expert pulling out a clot and saying "weird."
There's no evidence in this video that implicates the vaccine in any way, outside of the opinion of the embalmer, who provides no evidence the victim is even vaccinated. It's not going to be a useful piece of ammo in your arsenal, but you are welcome to test it against other people than me.
Two different communities, two different sets of rules.
I personally would be quite happy to host a Q community on Reddit. I enjoy talking with people I don't agree with.
But Reddit has shut down every subreddit that allows Q stuff to exist following Jan 6th. I don't really like it, but moderators are nobodies. I don't know the people at Reddit. I don't know any other moderator.
Hell, I'm only over there maybe once a week. I don't have any special loyalty to the site. I'm on here FAR more than on Reddit.
This website isn't bound by Reddit's rules. So Q stuff can exist here.
I like talking Q stuff. So here I am. And as long as I'm respectful, and ensure my questions and answers are in the spirit of honest research, I think the moderators recognize the utility of having different perspectives on a research website.
And, to be clear, I don't think I personally have ever kicked out a Q person from the subreddit just for being a Q person. I can't speak for other moderators and, as I said, I'm not over there much anyway.
Not much to be gained by talking with people who agree with you.
Well, I have no idea. I'm not a doctor. I've seen clots, and that is definitely a clot, but that's all I can say with certainty.
I've run across this video before. The man who filmed it, Richard Hirschman, is NOT a doctor. He's an embalmer. He's not a medical expert and can't diagnose anything. He is not a pathologist who establishes cause of death.
His only job is to prepare bodies for funerals.
What he can say with confidence is that he is pulling out an unusual number of clots from the bodies he works on.
What he CANNOT say is that these clots happened because of the vaccine. He has no way to know or prove that.
In fact, since the vaccination status of dead bodies is not really useful info for an embalmer, I'm not entirely certain how Hirschman would know or prove the vaccination status of any of these bodies.
So why all the new clots?
Well, probably because COVID-19 is well-known to cause microdamage in vessels, which can lead to clotting problems. Blood clots are a known and established side-effect of COVID-19 infection.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.42094
So with videos like this, what can I say is probably true?
Richard Hirschman is probably an embalmer, based on outside sources.
Hirschman probably did pull out that clot from a real dead body.
Hirschman probably is seeing more clots than he's used to seeing in usual places (although I'd like to see hard data that "over half" of his bodies are showing these clots).
What do I have to assume here to reach your conclusion?
That the body he's working on is vaccinated. There is no proof of this, and it's literally the only detail that supports his argument.
If the body was vaccinated, that the person had never gotten COVID-19 (which would explain clotting damage), either before or despite the vaccine.
That unvaccinated bodies are not showing the same signs of clots (the research I've seen suggests otherwise).
That Hirschman actually does even know the vaccination status of any of the bodies he's working on (again, I'm not sure why, and he'd need to document this for it to be credible).
So if I make absolutely no assumptions, what does this video actually prove?
That an embalmer pulled a long clot out of a body, and he thought it was weird.
That's all I can really get from this, because that's all the video directly provides. Anything else, including the vaccination status of the body, is just an assumption.
Well, that conclusion requires other conclusions about the vaccine that I don't necessarily agree with, but would require more energy and motivation to debate it than I have today. :)
I can say that the video on its own is likely to scare people who believe the vaccine is dangerous, and utterly unconvincing to those who believe otherwise.
That's not a slight against you. That's just the nature of this particular evidence. It's of a non-medical-expert pulling out a clot and saying "weird."
There's no evidence in this video that implicates the vaccine in any way, outside of the opinion of the embalmer, who provides no evidence the victim is even vaccinated. It's not going to be a useful piece of ammo in your arsenal, but you are welcome to test it against other people than me.
Two different communities, two different sets of rules.
I personally would be quite happy to host a Q community on Reddit. I enjoy talking with people I don't agree with.
But Reddit has shut down every subreddit that allows Q stuff to exist following Jan 6th. I don't really like it, but moderators are nobodies. I don't know the people at Reddit. I don't know any other moderator.
Hell, I'm only over there maybe once a week. I don't have any special loyalty to the site. I'm on here FAR more than on Reddit.
This website isn't bound by Reddit's rules. So Q stuff can exist here.
I like talking Q stuff. So here I am. And as long as I'm respectful, and ensure my questions and answers are in the spirit of honest research, I think the moderators recognize the utility of having different perspectives on a research website.
And, to be clear, I don't think I personally have ever kicked out a Q person from the subreddit just for being a Q person. I can't speak for other moderators and, as I said, I'm not over there much anyway.
Not much to be gained by talking with people who agree with you.