Wow, this is a steaming pile of unconvincing flailing. “Who do you believe, us, objective fact checkers for the Associated Press, or your lying eyes?”
The mules recorded dumping piles of ballots in the drop boxes could’ve just been doing it for (large) families, or the disabled! And many were wearing gloves (in Atlanta) because of the cold, and COVID. And then they threw their rubber gloves in the trash because it, I dunno, warmed up quickly. 🙄🙄🙄
Pages and pages of fatuous and false deboonking like this only makes this movie seem even more credible than it already did.
The cell phone data is the same that prosecutors use in court against We The People, but when we use it against [them] they say its not accurate enough. Kek
Just like Facebook knows who I am if I'm using a VPN on a fresh phone that never had it installed. Has me pinned down to the area, and somehow understands my age range and also apparently where I went to school because it suggests people to me that I knew in fucking elementary school and haven't interacted with in two decades when I fake my name / birth date / etc.
Well, the cell phone data is good for proving where someone was, not what they were doing there.
Proving that somebody was within a few feet of where they were standing is pretty good proof they were at Trump’s rally for a precise amount of time, and where they traveled in that rally.
Being in certain areas (like the Capitol) during the rally was a crime, so a location is good enough to prove a crime occurred.
Proving that someone walked near a drop box a few times, when those drop boxes are deliberately placed on highly-trafficked areas, doesn’t prove a crime, because it wasn’t illegal to walk through public areas more than once. The location isn’t illegal.
So location data in this case doesn’t really prove a crime, because cell phone data can’t prove someone was dropping off fake votes. That would have to be corroborated by additional evidence for that specific individual.
The OFFICIAL GOVT VIDEO of the folks dropping in multiple ballots - at multiple drop box locations - on the same night - taken at the same time as the cell phone location data track shows the phone was there - IS the corroboration as to what happened.
Either that - or you were one of those Mules trying to shift blame.....
The threshold that True the Vote used for trips to these boxes by one person was TWENTY FIVE. They wanted it to be patently obvious that something shady was going on. So twenty five trips by one cell phone to same drop box.
I'm glad you're here to debate this. It'd be best to watch the movie, which won't be a waste of time. It'll address many questions and arguments. It will also prove AP's phony fact check is absurd. If AP were honest, they would be asking if these same mules normally traveled to these dropbox locations before or after the election week window.
Well, the AP isn’t the one making the claim, so I’d say the burden of providing that proof would be on the documentary. If they want their numbers to be credible, then they need to be the ones closing in these gaps in the data. It’s not up to me or the AP to validate their claims for them.
I too am interested in the range that this data was collected. I’ll see if I can track down a written report on which this documentary was based.
I haven’t seen the film yet and can’t respond to its evidence.
Only the question as to why the cell phone location data was considered powerful evidence of criminal trespass and significantly less powerful (on its own) of proving that people were in the area to drop off fraudulent votes as part of a major criminal conspiracy.
Proving 2000 people were in areas he considered suspicious is fine. But if none of those areas are illegal, then he still has to match those 2000 data points with an actual crime.
I would hope the film presents compelling evidence proving each of those people actually committed a crime.I look forward to seeing it later.
Wow, this is a steaming pile of unconvincing flailing. “Who do you believe, us, objective fact checkers for the Associated Press, or your lying eyes?”
The mules recorded dumping piles of ballots in the drop boxes could’ve just been doing it for (large) families, or the disabled! And many were wearing gloves (in Atlanta) because of the cold, and COVID. And then they threw their rubber gloves in the trash because it, I dunno, warmed up quickly. 🙄🙄🙄
Pages and pages of fatuous and false deboonking like this only makes this movie seem even more credible than it already did.
The cell phone data is the same that prosecutors use in court against We The People, but when we use it against [them] they say its not accurate enough. Kek
Hahaha - their debunk is saying the tracking could be meters off.
More headlines trying to influence lazy people who won’t read or critically scrutinize the ‘facts’ in the article.
This article is a steaming heap of propaganda
Just like Facebook knows who I am if I'm using a VPN on a fresh phone that never had it installed. Has me pinned down to the area, and somehow understands my age range and also apparently where I went to school because it suggests people to me that I knew in fucking elementary school and haven't interacted with in two decades when I fake my name / birth date / etc.
I wish we'd stop letting him roam around.
Well, the cell phone data is good for proving where someone was, not what they were doing there.
Proving that somebody was within a few feet of where they were standing is pretty good proof they were at Trump’s rally for a precise amount of time, and where they traveled in that rally.
Being in certain areas (like the Capitol) during the rally was a crime, so a location is good enough to prove a crime occurred.
Proving that someone walked near a drop box a few times, when those drop boxes are deliberately placed on highly-trafficked areas, doesn’t prove a crime, because it wasn’t illegal to walk through public areas more than once. The location isn’t illegal.
So location data in this case doesn’t really prove a crime, because cell phone data can’t prove someone was dropping off fake votes. That would have to be corroborated by additional evidence for that specific individual.
Watch the movie, THEN comment.
The OFFICIAL GOVT VIDEO of the folks dropping in multiple ballots - at multiple drop box locations - on the same night - taken at the same time as the cell phone location data track shows the phone was there - IS the corroboration as to what happened.
Either that - or you were one of those Mules trying to shift blame.....
The threshold that True the Vote used for trips to these boxes by one person was TWENTY FIVE. They wanted it to be patently obvious that something shady was going on. So twenty five trips by one cell phone to same drop box.
Surveillance camera mean anything to you?
I'm glad you're here to debate this. It'd be best to watch the movie, which won't be a waste of time. It'll address many questions and arguments. It will also prove AP's phony fact check is absurd. If AP were honest, they would be asking if these same mules normally traveled to these dropbox locations before or after the election week window.
Well, the AP isn’t the one making the claim, so I’d say the burden of providing that proof would be on the documentary. If they want their numbers to be credible, then they need to be the ones closing in these gaps in the data. It’s not up to me or the AP to validate their claims for them.
I too am interested in the range that this data was collected. I’ll see if I can track down a written report on which this documentary was based.
I haven’t seen the film yet and can’t respond to its evidence.
Only the question as to why the cell phone location data was considered powerful evidence of criminal trespass and significantly less powerful (on its own) of proving that people were in the area to drop off fraudulent votes as part of a major criminal conspiracy.
Proving 2000 people were in areas he considered suspicious is fine. But if none of those areas are illegal, then he still has to match those 2000 data points with an actual crime.
I would hope the film presents compelling evidence proving each of those people actually committed a crime.I look forward to seeing it later.
Lmao bro you are obsessed with this guy. I like you both but I find your relationship hilarious.
Who owns AP? Reuters. Who owns Reuters? Rothschild family.
I thought it was pre-bunked already? You know, by WaPo. But, I guess a post-bunk is also a good thing. Clown world.
The Streisand Effect