Well, that conclusion requires other conclusions about the vaccine that I don't necessarily agree with, but would require more energy and motivation to debate it than I have today. :)
I can say that the video on its own is likely to scare people who believe the vaccine is dangerous, and utterly unconvincing to those who believe otherwise.
That's not a slight against you. That's just the nature of this particular evidence. It's of a non-medical-expert pulling out a clot and saying "weird."
There's no evidence in this video that implicates the vaccine in any way, outside of the opinion of the embalmer, who provides no evidence the victim is even vaccinated. It's not going to be a useful piece of ammo in your arsenal, but you are welcome to test it against other people than me.
Well, that conclusion requires other conclusions about the vaccine that I don't necessarily agree with, but would require more energy and motivation to debate it than I have today. :)
I can say that the video on its own is likely to scare people who believe the vaccine is dangerous, and utterly unconvincing to those who believe otherwise.
That's not a slight against you. That's just the nature of this particular evidence. It's of a non-medical-expert pulling out a clot and saying "weird."
There's no evidence in this video that implicates the vaccine in any way, outside of the opinion of the embalmer, who provides no evidence the victim is even vaccinated. It's not going to be a useful piece of ammo in your arsenal, but you are welcome to test it against other people than me.
As I've said, the plural of anecdotes is not data. Any dots can have lines drawn between them.
If you'd like to write up a report establishing the viable connection of these dots for publication, I am happy to help you sharpen it.