I have not seen a whole lot of evidence about the JJ vax causing ongoing clotting. There is a risk when you first get it. I am not downplaying that. My point is that if that risk is great enough to shut down that vax, then for sure the FDA would also shut down the other vaxes. So, why don't they?
You seem to be thinking that my point implied that there is nothing wrong with the JJ vax, and that is not what I said at all.
The point is, a risk is a risk is a risk. How many have died directly from the mRNA shots? More than 20K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But the JJ is pulled out of circulation because of 9 deaths?
I have not seen a whole lot of evidence about the JJ vax causing ongoing clotting. There is a risk when you first get it. I am not downplaying that. My point is that if that risk is great enough to shut down that vax, then for sure the FDA would also shut down the other vaxes. So, why don't they?
You seem to be thinking that my point implied that there is nothing wrong with the JJ vax, and that is not what I said at all.
Someone else just posted my point: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HuoNRJCg/fda-limiting-jj-due-to-blood-clo/c/
The point is, a risk is a risk is a risk. How many have died directly from the mRNA shots? More than 20K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But the JJ is pulled out of circulation because of 9 deaths?
Where's the parity?