Much love to you all!!!!!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (134)
sorted by:
I’m aware of many cases like this. I think everyone is.
All I'm saying is I have yet to see even one case where the opposite is true, that cancer "fixed" someone Ala a healing factor
It says on this article that 1/100,000 are ‘able to shed the disease without treatment’ https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150306-the-mystery-of-vanishing-cancer it was the first google result for a basic search. You may say it didn’t fixed them, but they are fixed.
Somehow getting rid if cancer isn't the same to me as cancer being a fixative condition.
Their bodies either cured what wasn't supposed to be there, or as possible in some cases, was a misdiagnosis and they never had it. Imaging etc. Are still dodgy enough that I can see that as a very real possibility.
Treatment methods and their damage aside, I'd take an example where someone had, say, cirrhosis of the liver, got liver cancer, and then when they beat it they were found to no longer have cirrhosis.
When I think of cancer healing something, I picture my grandfather who lost 1/2 a lung to TB in prisoner of war camp. He never got lung cancer, but if he had and they operated to find a whole intact lung where there had been half of one in 1946, I'd agree with you.
And as a retired gambler I need better odds than 1/100,000.
The way I’m wondering things could be is: cancer is a healing process that is active in your body at all times. When a tumor is detectable with large mass, the cancer is probably already failing due to the problem being too difficult. I’m not actually convinced things are this way, but I am questioning.
The article is pretty clear that the cancer was never the fixative,but rather some unknown immune response or other method the body did that destroyed the cancer.