Long, long list that spans decades. He got way more things wrong then he got right with all his old prediction newsletters (which is why he doesn't do them any longer) - especially revolving around money.

He's nearly 100% wrong about anything and everything he discusses regarding health - I could go on forever. He prediced the cabal would kill 90% of the population with a "virus" many, mean years ago. He still believes in viruses even though they've been proven utterly fallacious for almost 2 years now for anybody who cares to investigate. He still drones on and on about immunity, chaga mushrooms, etc. even though there's no such thing as the "immune system". He thinks he "beat cancer" with certain supplement/fasting/sauna techniques but as with all so-called "cancer therapies", all of them "work" sometimes, but never all the time. Which should lead one, if nothing else, to question whether it was their "technique/regimen" that worked, or perhaps it was something else.

He's picked up some good nuggets in the lawful realm that apparently bailed him out of his defamation case with that Corey Goode guy, but he's a long, long way from understanding much more than the small things he learned. I'd highly recommend you get a second, third, fourth opinion before you take him on his word when it comes to law.

Lately he's more often wrong than he's right about the "Elohim" and what role they've played in this realm (Elohim is often translated to "God" in the bible BTW).

All that said, he's fun to listen to and he's read a ton of alternative history which always makes for an interesting talk. I'm not ragging on the guy, but his problem is he couches his talks as if he's 100% right, when he's clearly not as illustrated above. This alone makes me question anything and everything he says, even when I do agree with him. If only he would say "this is what I believe" or "this is what I've found" rather than "This is the truth about subject xyz".

Net-Net - You should take everything Clif says with several hundred grains of salt. He's fun to listen to, and he's educated himself on a wide variety of subjects no doubt. But he's apparently unwilling to admit when he's wrong, as most of us are, which is what I find most troubling. With the audience he has, this would be a commendable virtue to add to his arsenal. We're all wrong sometimes. Admitting it is the hard part.