You make no sense. Why would you give a shit about the truth, if what the truth is means nothing to you? A clue comes from your "the spinning ball feels like bullshit." You cannot think by resorting to "feelings." The effect of the spin is insensible to the human body. But not to the atmosphere, in which it produces cyclones. And not to the oceans, in which it produces the equatorial bulge. I've by now pointed out that the spherical bulge in a bucket of water is simply too small to observe. We do live on a big planet, and being sufficiently big over a small scale sure looks "flat." Larger scales, not so much.
I see the curve at an altitude of 40,000 feet. Of course, that is no accomplishment, since even a flat LP-disk Earth would show a curve at its edge. A point which you obviously have not taken into consideration. The more definite proof is that you can sail west or east and will ultimately return to your starting point. Impossible if the Earth is not round. Same thing with airplane flight. Even more so with satellites.
Speaking of brainwashed and believing what you are told, you are a prime example. You have turned your back on actual knowledge and subscribed to a cult belief system that has to deny most of modern life. All those poor, deluded people who are picking up TV signals from satellites. All those befuddled nitwits that are having telephone calls around the world to where it is night instead of day (I do that all the time, with my family in Africa).
How is it that, of the two of us, I am the only one providing information to explain all these things? You couldn't explain yourself if your life depended on it.
You don't have to wait long. I will expect your apology and change of heart real soon. See the other exchange for the color photo. Here's the strip image of the Earth taken by the Lunar Orbiter probe. I have a big print copy of this that I got shortly after it was released. https://i.redd.it/f2j7dx90nghz.jpg
The Lunar Orbiter had a strip map camera where it took the photograph on a continuous film strip and ran it past a TV camera, which sent the scanned image to Earth for reproduction. It was all analog signal processing. No computer image processing at that time. We went to the Moon and you are one of the very few on Earth who does not want to accept reality. You are mentally disturbed. You promised you would have a change of view if I provided you non-CGI images, and you have welshed on your promise. You are as fake as a 3-dollar bill.
Don't you know what you are doing to yourself? There is no evidence that can convince you. You don't know CGI from pastel paints. You don't want to see reality. You want to live in a paranoid fantasy. You have gone through the hatch and pulled it in after you. You would rather believe in the lack of any evidence of a flat Earth, than you would in the true evidence of its roundness and the fact that we live in a solar system of planets orbiting a sun, and that this system is only a tiny part of the cosmos, greater than you can imagine.
I could wish that you would be taken on an orbit around the Earth, to see for yourself out of your own eyeballs, but I bet you would refuse to look. You are that crazy. You don't belong on this board at all. The watchword here is truth and reality---and you have nothing to do with either.
The color photo from the Moon? It is a chemical photograph. There was no CGI in 1969, brainiac. That came decades later. Don't attempt to correct me when you have no idea what you are talking about.
So here's the thing. There was no computer graphics back then. There were barely computers. These are chemical photographs. What this means is (1) you don't know shit what you are talking about, and (2) you have no integrity or honor, because you argue in bad faith. I provided non-CGI photos. They were real on the dates they were taken. I was alive then. You have just busted yourself for being an ignoramus and a liar.
And even the ones you deplore are still legitimate...but you don't understand how. I can explain if you want to know. (There is a real South Pole, by the way. Visited many times. The 1957 expedition was noteworthy.)
You make no sense. Why would you give a shit about the truth, if what the truth is means nothing to you? A clue comes from your "the spinning ball feels like bullshit." You cannot think by resorting to "feelings." The effect of the spin is insensible to the human body. But not to the atmosphere, in which it produces cyclones. And not to the oceans, in which it produces the equatorial bulge. I've by now pointed out that the spherical bulge in a bucket of water is simply too small to observe. We do live on a big planet, and being sufficiently big over a small scale sure looks "flat." Larger scales, not so much.
I see the curve at an altitude of 40,000 feet. Of course, that is no accomplishment, since even a flat LP-disk Earth would show a curve at its edge. A point which you obviously have not taken into consideration. The more definite proof is that you can sail west or east and will ultimately return to your starting point. Impossible if the Earth is not round. Same thing with airplane flight. Even more so with satellites.
Speaking of brainwashed and believing what you are told, you are a prime example. You have turned your back on actual knowledge and subscribed to a cult belief system that has to deny most of modern life. All those poor, deluded people who are picking up TV signals from satellites. All those befuddled nitwits that are having telephone calls around the world to where it is night instead of day (I do that all the time, with my family in Africa).
How is it that, of the two of us, I am the only one providing information to explain all these things? You couldn't explain yourself if your life depended on it.
Do me a favor go find me one pic from NASA of the earth that is not CGI. I'LL WAIT HERE
You don't have to wait long. I will expect your apology and change of heart real soon. See the other exchange for the color photo. Here's the strip image of the Earth taken by the Lunar Orbiter probe. I have a big print copy of this that I got shortly after it was released. https://i.redd.it/f2j7dx90nghz.jpg
LUNAR ORBITER PROBE? LOL BETTER MAKE SURE THEY ARE NOT CGI
DEAR GOD. YOU THINK WE WENT TO THE MOON
The Lunar Orbiter had a strip map camera where it took the photograph on a continuous film strip and ran it past a TV camera, which sent the scanned image to Earth for reproduction. It was all analog signal processing. No computer image processing at that time. We went to the Moon and you are one of the very few on Earth who does not want to accept reality. You are mentally disturbed. You promised you would have a change of view if I provided you non-CGI images, and you have welshed on your promise. You are as fake as a 3-dollar bill.
Don't you know what you are doing to yourself? There is no evidence that can convince you. You don't know CGI from pastel paints. You don't want to see reality. You want to live in a paranoid fantasy. You have gone through the hatch and pulled it in after you. You would rather believe in the lack of any evidence of a flat Earth, than you would in the true evidence of its roundness and the fact that we live in a solar system of planets orbiting a sun, and that this system is only a tiny part of the cosmos, greater than you can imagine.
I could wish that you would be taken on an orbit around the Earth, to see for yourself out of your own eyeballs, but I bet you would refuse to look. You are that crazy. You don't belong on this board at all. The watchword here is truth and reality---and you have nothing to do with either.
THAT PIC IS CGI
The color photo from the Moon? It is a chemical photograph. There was no CGI in 1969, brainiac. That came decades later. Don't attempt to correct me when you have no idea what you are talking about.
Bruh. Those pics are computer graphic images
So here's the thing. There was no computer graphics back then. There were barely computers. These are chemical photographs. What this means is (1) you don't know shit what you are talking about, and (2) you have no integrity or honor, because you argue in bad faith. I provided non-CGI photos. They were real on the dates they were taken. I was alive then. You have just busted yourself for being an ignoramus and a liar.
Smdh
What? Speak up. You talk as though you had your shoe in your mouth.
You provide me one pic of the earth from space that is not CGI, i will agree the earth is a ball
Easy. Any photo from the Apollo program, before computer-generated imagery was possible. Here's one from the New York Times: https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/09/01/opinion/1opdoc-earthrise/1opdoc-earthrise-facebookJumbo.jpg
And even the ones you deplore are still legitimate...but you don't understand how. I can explain if you want to know. (There is a real South Pole, by the way. Visited many times. The 1957 expedition was noteworthy.)