At 40,000 feet, I have seen the curve. End of story. And if you were courageous enough to look at the Apollo photographs, you would "see the curve" also, so cut the bullshit about any of this being fake. You are just too cowardly and lazy to see the pictures that are available today, such as this taken from the International Space Station: https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/4E79798C-A892-47A5-8A52900FABF9BE81_medium.jpg. See the curve? And it's not CGI, so stop making up a myth.
You guys. You keep on saying there are no contemporary images, but all one has to do is look for them and they are there in profusion. Maybe not of the whole planet, but you put your camera within a half-inch of a basketball and try to take a picture of the whole ball. Impossible, right? So, not only do you not understand astronomy, you don't understand photography.
I can help you understand, but I don't take instruction from the ignorant.
It's unavoidable. It's also something that would be seen for a flat earth as well (the rim of the LP record effect)---or weren't you aware of that? Glad to see that you had no argument against all the other points I raised.
Just because Neil DeGrasse Tyson is not the sharpest pair of scissors doesn't mean that gravity doesn't exist. What other force can you explain? They all boil down to questions we can't answer.
There are plenty. You just have the idea that CGI is are for nefarious purposes. It's the only way you can generate a picture of a whole object if the camera is only a relatively tiny distance from it. The Moon photos are perfectly realistic (plenty of distance)...and we will be able to do it again fairly soon (I hope).
At 40,000 feet, I have seen the curve. End of story. And if you were courageous enough to look at the Apollo photographs, you would "see the curve" also, so cut the bullshit about any of this being fake. You are just too cowardly and lazy to see the pictures that are available today, such as this taken from the International Space Station: https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/4E79798C-A892-47A5-8A52900FABF9BE81_medium.jpg. See the curve? And it's not CGI, so stop making up a myth.
You guys. You keep on saying there are no contemporary images, but all one has to do is look for them and they are there in profusion. Maybe not of the whole planet, but you put your camera within a half-inch of a basketball and try to take a picture of the whole ball. Impossible, right? So, not only do you not understand astronomy, you don't understand photography.
I can help you understand, but I don't take instruction from the ignorant.
Congrats the 1st one ever to see the curve from 40,000 ft. You are a special kind of stupid
It's unavoidable. It's also something that would be seen for a flat earth as well (the rim of the LP record effect)---or weren't you aware of that? Glad to see that you had no argument against all the other points I raised.
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTdGEwB4C/?k=1
Just because Neil DeGrasse Tyson is not the sharpest pair of scissors doesn't mean that gravity doesn't exist. What other force can you explain? They all boil down to questions we can't answer.
You raised no points glad you dont wonder why we cant see apic that hasn't been CGI by NASA
There are plenty. You just have the idea that CGI is are for nefarious purposes. It's the only way you can generate a picture of a whole object if the camera is only a relatively tiny distance from it. The Moon photos are perfectly realistic (plenty of distance)...and we will be able to do it again fairly soon (I hope).