Why does an infant with no teeth need fluoride?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
Without taking a stand on fluoride, I must advise you that infants do have teeth, they simply have not yet erupted. Children are also given fluoride during their growing years to incorporate fluoride into the enamel of their not yet erupted adult teeth. Adults do not take systemic fluoride supplements for their teeth, as their teeth have already developed and erupted. Topical fluorides are used in adults (and children). It is proven that there is significantly less dental caries disease in children and adults that have had systemic fluoride supplements. Too much fluoride during tooth development will cause dental fluorosis, leaving teeth a mottled and ugly appearance, but caries resistant.
One may expect increased dental bills if you do not give your child fluoride, and dental abcesses can be life threatening. I have seen many of them requiring hospitalization and drainage.
You must be medical? Only someone brainwashed into the Rockefeller system would be so insane as to say the contents of the scrubbers from the phosphate aluminium and nuclear industries can do a body or teeth good. I have quoted elsewhere what sane people have said about this cancer causing useless evil shit being given to our children. No wonder one in two get cancer
Practiced Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery over 30 years. I prefaced my statement as not taking a stand of Flouride, but I wanted to let to poster know that babies to have teeth developing prior to eruption, hence the rationale for giving fluoride to infants. My observations were based on clinical experience having worked in the trenches during my career. These observations are on teeth, not other effects of fluoride in the body. That being said I was also indoctrinated into the vaccines are good group. I have an entire different view of vaccines now with the fake vax of mRNA, and no longer trust the vaccine makers. (unjabbed here, will never take another vax, and hope my grandkids don't either) I hadn't researched the antiflouridationist stuff, just the few things I have read on here. I do believe that adding fluoride to community drinking water is akin to forcing vaccines on people. They should be able to make their own choice, and today my thoughts are that adding flouride to drinking water takes that choice away and should not be done. And yes, full informed consent should be given for fluoride as apparently there are other issues with it other that it's effect on teeth. As for the pineal gland stuff, I do believe more research is needed as the pineal gland is poorly understood. I try to be open minded and realize bias may be at work. Always willing to change my perspective.
I searched fluoride in the forums and I just found this post from it looks like a month ago. I searched for it here because I am kinda torn on this fluoride thing. My 2 year old pediatric dentist says she doesn't need fluoride because her teeth are perfect.. the dentist also told me he didn't supplement his children with it either.. but today my daughter saw her Dr for her 2 year checkup and without asking me, she said " I am going to go ahead and prescribe her a multivitamin with fluoride in it. I told her that her dentist said that she didn't need it.. she was kinda floored because she also asked if he was pediatric, I said yeah, he is in the same building as you.. she just couldn't believe it. I guess I just didn't like the was she told me she was gonna prescribe it without asking.. but at the end of the check up she said that if we don't supplement it in the vitamin that she recommends that my daughter drink some tap water daily to get the fluoride. Just seems so odd to me that we can get the prescription she wanted to prescribe straight from the Tap... but maybe my daughter will have horrible teeth when she is older because of not supplementing now.
retard.
Please tell me how Africans or Native Indians, etc have great teeth without all their glorious fluoride treatments. You must work in the dental industry and suffering from some good ol' cognitive dissonance.
This^
Not all of them. We have a young Zambian relative whose teeth are in terrible shape from lack of care. Pretty much everyone drinks poorly filtered and untreated well water. There are no municipal water systems. Don't get the idea that this is a good thing. Aquifers can get polluted.
I must advise you to quit copying and pasting globohomo shit without posting sources.
https://www.ada.org/resources/research/science-and-research-institute/oral-health-topics/fluoride-topical-and-systemic-supplements
You state that it is proven that there are less caries in children and adults that use fluoride. Speaking as someone that was involved in medical and dental research for years, I was exposed to those same epidemiological studies in college. Dig deeper. Epidemiological studies are flawed and are not based on true clinical science. They are at their basically nothing more than statistical opinion. This is especially true concerning the whole premise underpinning the systemic use of fluoride in children. Gee, where have we heard safe and effective before? It is a common line used when trying to sell their own brand of snake oil.
From the very beginning, that entire public health policy surrounding fluoride was based on financial interests of commercial oligarchy - namely aluminum manufactures that were faced with the prospect of a huge financial burden to remove their toxic byproducts from the nation's water systems that they had been polluting. FDR created the US Public Health Service, and with the help of his corporate buddies at Alcoa Aluminum and the corrupt AMA, the US was given our current narrative about fluoride. Professional cancel culture was alive and well long before Covid in this arena concerning fluoride for anyone that dared to challenge the narrative. The same attitude holds true for vaxxines - but that is a conversation for another thread.
As far as real clinical science goes, it was stated in the ADA's own journal in either 2000 or 2002 that systemic use of fluoride did nothing to reduce acid solubility of dental structures. This does not even take into account the problems caused by dental fluorosis - and teeth are not the only calcified structures in the body. But yet we continue to poison millions of people by exposing them to fluoride that in actually has no nutritional purpose in human health. However, the ADA also concluded in that same paper that topical use of fluoride did help remineralize enamel. But keep in mind that in order for enamel to mineralize, that process takes approximately 20 to 30 minutes. Which is not long enough considering how most fluoride is used - either by water or toothpastes. Therefore, topical use of fluoride for purposes of remineralization are all but useless. There are safer alternatives to fluoride if topical remineralization is the goal - ACP and MCHA - that do not have the toxic effects associated with fluoride.
The bottom line is that fluoride is a toxic compound and should not be used under any circumstances. The list of its deleterious effects on the human body continue to grow and continue to be ignored. I have been on the front lines of this issue for years and have professionally taken the heat for exposing the ugly truth. I realized in college that it was all BS and tried to challenge the narratives even then. We must research for ourselves and be critical thinkers. What health care professionals claim as proof often is based on circular reasoning birthed from purely financial, and in some cases political, motivations. The American public has been sold a bill of goods on fluoride and professionals tasked with the responsibility of caring for patients continue to propagate the lie.