Unless it gets more virulent, it doesn't really matter. The infection fatality rate is well be low 1%, with the majority of deaths in people over 75 years old. We'll be fine. The White House has never been correct about any of this stuff anyway.
I'm sure they will still try to use it as an excuse to lock us down and use mail-in voting again.
With all of the studies contrary to the FDA/CDC approvals of these jabs, why hasn't some group posed a legal challenge to the jabs showing they're dangerous? At least, the discovery will release a lot of contrary peer-reviewed studies into the media showing the issues caused by the jab. I understand that the mandate for fed employees and contractors was overturned but private companies can still require what they want as conditions of employment (and prices of insurance, etc).
Unless it gets more virulent, it doesn't really matter. The infection fatality rate is well be low 1%, with the majority of deaths in people over 75 years old. We'll be fine. The White House has never been correct about any of this stuff anyway.
I'm sure they will still try to use it as an excuse to lock us down and use mail-in voting again.
Roll up your sleeves sheep. Shots 5 and 6 on deck.
How can you design a booster for a variant that doesn't even exist yet?
...unless you're just making the whole thing up. Hmmm...
The unvaxed will be just fine. Pray for the 🐑 that destroyed their immune systems and may possibly die as a result.
With all of the studies contrary to the FDA/CDC approvals of these jabs, why hasn't some group posed a legal challenge to the jabs showing they're dangerous? At least, the discovery will release a lot of contrary peer-reviewed studies into the media showing the issues caused by the jab. I understand that the mandate for fed employees and contractors was overturned but private companies can still require what they want as conditions of employment (and prices of insurance, etc).