Have you actually watched the video, or is this just an emotional response because it's hard to imagine that screen actors might lie for propaganda purposes?
I've looked into it extensively, and have no emotional attachment to be giving an emotional response about this.
This is a true distraction, like who gives a shit if he is or not, either way you look at it, Q said he was mossad/controlled opposition. So why even give any attention to this crap?
I'd like to see some evidence to support that.
Have you actually watched the video, or is this just an emotional response because it's hard to imagine that screen actors might lie for propaganda purposes?
We KNOW they do.
I've looked into it extensively, and have no emotional attachment to be giving an emotional response about this.
This is a true distraction, like who gives a shit if he is or not, either way you look at it, Q said he was mossad/controlled opposition. So why even give any attention to this crap?
Because research is research. Seems weird that you're intent on other people not digging when you admit that he's Mossad controlled opposition.
People need to understand the game of actors. Layers upon layers of personas.
How can we find truth if we just tell other people to stop digging because we have our own firm opinion?
The distraction is you saying "look here, not there"
Again who gives a flying fuck if he is or is not bill Hicks? Like answer me why that matters? But it fucking doesn't
The only thing I question is why you're so ridiculously mad that people might take 25 minutes to look into the idea and make up their own mind.
You really come across as a guy "with no emotional attachment".