A left wing investigative journalist named Greg Palast wrote an article attempting to discredit 2000 Mules. It's here: https://tinyurl.com/wn6t4knc

I have two ongoing debates branching off from Palast's tweet of his article.

First thread: https://tinyurl.com/mvv6zxnr

Second thread: https://tinyurl.com/65z25zd3

These are their arguments:

1. Geo tracking is not accurate. The proximity can be off by 93 feet. "If someone is jogging by a few boxes they are counted as a mule."

2. Even if these people walked within proximity of boxes, there's no proof of interaction with them.

3. There's no video of one person at more than one box. These people were dropping off ballots for relatives.

Concerning point three, one person claims "My brother in law probably made a half dozen trips all by himself. All he did was help people vote legitimately." I believe this person sincerely believes this activity is legitimate. That's why I think these people can be red pilled, even if their awakening is delayed.

So that's the point of this post. Let's plant some seeds in these people's minds. I don't think they're all a lost cause. Some are, most aren't.

If you want to jump in, please eliminate any emotion. We want to fight opinions with facts. Source all arguments.

I'll continue my debate with them later when I'm off work.