All that is set out here is in the public domain and has been referred to in public open letters from US Senator Ron Johnson and others to various officials including the Sec State for Defense and Dr Fauci.
The letters are available on Ron Johnson's official senate web site and are dated from January 2022.
The media has failed to meaningful if at all report on any of this The documents referred to have been published, the grant applications are available and there has been no official statement that these documents or that Major Murphy's 2021 DARPA emails and report are a fiction or the claims are false
Not only did Major Murphy set out that there are significant risks with the mNRA vaccines and they should be halted but that by April 2020 DARPA researchers had confirmed that Ivermectin and Hydrochloroquine were effective against all stages of Covid including also stopping people catching Covid plus other cheap drugs were also effective
Covid-19 first appeared in China in Wuhan in locations near the lab that held probably the biggest collection of coronaviruses in the world and was developing a vaccine to be sprayed at wild bats to stop the spread of human pandemic corona viruses.
We know about the bat vaccine spray because Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance applied for US military funding in around 2018 and set this all out in the formal application.
This proposal included Dr Shi / Bat Woman of Wuhan spending an extended time at US military research labs in the USA testing the spray vaccine.
The military turned down the funding request because of the risks and the NIH and Dr Fauci then funded the project.
https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/
The high risk centered around taking bat coronaviruses and genetically modifying them to make them airborne and 10s or 1000s of times more infectious to humans than could naturally happen.
The idea was this new virus would then be modified in a lab to remove the human infectiousness and then used to create a vaccine to be sprayed on wild bats in caves to stop them becoming carriers of coronaviruses that could infect humans.
In mitigation of the risks EcoHealth had set out in the funding application that tests done showed by 2018 that Hydrochloroquine was an effective treatment against all coronaviruses
This data was revealed by the DRASTIC Group and also by Major Joseph Murphy of the USMC who while at DRAPA produced a report submitted to the DoD setting out his findings based on both classified and non classified information he had access to.
Major Murphy made a brief public statement when asked about the report saying he would not comment on anything specifically however he said there are those that are working to reveal the truth and others who are trying to suppress it. He hopes all will work towards truth
This is a start to a review of the public info on Covid-19 that has not been investigated. May update later
Why have Ivermectin and Hydrocloroquine and other DARPA confirmed Covid treatments like Amodiaquine not been tested at all or at the doses shown in trials by Drs to be effective.
Why did the WHO and FDA promote trials of HCQ at known fatal doses and then cancel the HCQ trial and trials of Ivermectin at low doses to high risk groups and not the general population.
Why was a Belgian multi hopsital trial study of 8000 patients given HCQ at normal doses v those not getting HCQ showing great effectiveness against Covid ignored
Mercks trials in 2001 showed Ivermectin to be very safe at 10x the recommended dose and other studies of pregnant women showed no adverse birth events.
https://communities.win/c/NoNewNormal/p/13zzR5S8kX/merck-funded-trial-with-merck-re/c
"This study was sponsored by a grant from Merck Research Laboratories, a division ofMerck & Co., Inc"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12362927/
Download full PDF study from webarchive
https://web.archive.org/web/20210719231037/https://sci-hub.st/10.1177/009127002237994
"Ivermectin was generally well tolerated, with no indication of associated CNS toxicity for doses up to 10 times the highest FDA‐approved dose of 200 μg/kg.
All dose regimens had a mydriatic effect similar to placebo.
Adverse experiences were similar between ivermectin and placebo and did not increase with dose."
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2002;42:1122-1133 ©2002 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology
"This study demonstrated that ivermectin is generally well tolerated at these higher doses and more frequent regimens."
"In summary, the safety profile generated in this study supports the use of oral ivermectin at the approved dose levels and at dose levels being considered for the treatment of head lice. Furthermore, a significant safety margin is demonstrated. However, studies in the pediatric population are necessary to confirm safety in children at higher dose levels.
The pharmacokinetic parameters are consistent with those previously established, with the exception of a slightly longer half-life. A significant food interaction was demonstrated.