If Project Looking Glass tech has been used to determine future strategy, could it be that in either timeline, through whatever universal algorithm, Dr. Oz won?
Difference being that in this timeline, Oprah's TV Doctor puppet got flipped by the White Hats?
Thus, for the timeline 5D chess game to proceed in a logical "known" fashion, it still requires a Dr. Oz "victory".
That is why Trump is so insistent on this confusing choice, and why there's such an effort to change that outcome.
Both sides with some form of Looking Glass, see potential future timelines. Both know that a particular offshoot of a timeline requires a Dr. Oz victory. (This may be related to "Wizard of Oz")
Oprah/Deep State get to Oz, victory is supposedly secured. Remember how much they were pushing the idea of Oprah in politics? Weird how that narrative entirely disappeared.
White Hats capture/flip the Oz piece. Child Trafficking Oprah disappears from political narrative.
Victory is assured, timeline stays intact. Plan moves forward.
Really not sure if I'm explaining myself correctly. These are half formed musings.
Just seems strange that Trump would pin a future victory on a questionable choice, while a large field is intent on splitting up interest.
If I’m not mistaken don’t all timelines eventually lead to the same outcome regardless according to looking glass?
Yes. But some of us want to see the 'right' outcome in our lifetime.
I can’t argue with that I can’t remember what year they all converge.
2012 if I remember correctly.