Actual facts: We know that Joe Biden has had extensive plastic surgery, which Trump has even commented on publicly. ("Why did he get all that plastic surgery if he's just gonna wear that big mask!)
So, with all the extensive plastic surgery he's had, to smooth out that ghoulish face, why would he still have certain markings that a plastic surgeon would have smoothed over?
The only conclusion is that those markings were specifically made.
You seem to be confused about the idea that a political double is supposed to look the same as the original.
Can you tell the difference between the Saddam doubles that we know existed? Or did they all look like Saddam?
In actual fact, it's not a traditional actor, more of an "organic robotoid" as described by the Dr. Beter audio tapes from the 70s/80s. That is, he is not a clone per se but clone-adjacent. Technology discovered interestingly enough in the Soviet era. They are operated by external programmers and have a holographic memory map of the original donor person. Thus, they can ideally recall events that the original experienced.
The same is said to have happened to Jimmy Carter.
Thing is, the shelf life is horrible, and while presumably they improved since the time of Dr. Beter, they are known to rapidly mentally fail past a certain point.
Remember when Jimmy Carter claimed to have been attacked by a giant rabbit?
"Joe" has the dementia excuse, but the fact remains that with this theory there is good reason why Biden was considered "the asset to use" for this. For all his downfalls, there had to be an upside to using him.
Regardless of your thoughts of my conclusion, the point still stands that it is clearly a secondary being and not the original Joe.
Now find images between 2004 and 1987.
Actual facts: We know that Joe Biden has had extensive plastic surgery, which Trump has even commented on publicly. ("Why did he get all that plastic surgery if he's just gonna wear that big mask!)
So, with all the extensive plastic surgery he's had, to smooth out that ghoulish face, why would he still have certain markings that a plastic surgeon would have smoothed over?
The only conclusion is that those markings were specifically made.
You seem to be confused about the idea that a political double is supposed to look the same as the original.
Can you tell the difference between the Saddam doubles that we know existed? Or did they all look like Saddam?
In actual fact, it's not a traditional actor, more of an "organic robotoid" as described by the Dr. Beter audio tapes from the 70s/80s. That is, he is not a clone per se but clone-adjacent. Technology discovered interestingly enough in the Soviet era. They are operated by external programmers and have a holographic memory map of the original donor person. Thus, they can ideally recall events that the original experienced.
The same is said to have happened to Jimmy Carter.
Thing is, the shelf life is horrible, and while presumably they improved since the time of Dr. Beter, they are known to rapidly mentally fail past a certain point.
Remember when Jimmy Carter claimed to have been attacked by a giant rabbit?
"Joe" has the dementia excuse, but the fact remains that with this theory there is good reason why Biden was considered "the asset to use" for this. For all his downfalls, there had to be an upside to using him.
Regardless of your thoughts of my conclusion, the point still stands that it is clearly a secondary being and not the original Joe.
This isn't an episode of terminator.
Based on the post, I'm assuming transsexual.