Sleepy Joe is ***NOT*** A Double - The Great Awakening

Sleepy Joe is ***NOT*** A Double (media.greatawakening.win) 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 2 years ago by NOT_ADMIN 2 years ago by NOT_ADMIN +38 / -3

79 comments download

79 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (79)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– NOT_ADMIN [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

1. Peoples lips wrinkle when they make the "w" with their mouth. do you not see his lips are much more stiff, while the other photo taken over 5 years ago is relaxed? I do not include data that is clearly dependent on a specific facial gesture. I suggest you look in the mirror and watch wrinkles from on your lips when you tighten them with a "w" and disappear when you relax them.
1. Peoples ears sag and grow as they age. The shape is very much the same. the lobs look attached from whats called pixie ear.
1. Again not going to include faulty data points. every image he has a different mouth shape to what ever sound he is producing at the time of the photo.
1. If you mean near the mouth, same as 3.
1. Ears? they do, I will photoshop them on top of each other.
1. Only with age tolerances. and facelifts. its public knowledge hes gotten them.
Wrinkle maps (as a whole) is a fingerprint. No two people have the same map.

( I will use logic reversal and point out faulty datapoints like you did.) you say 2004 and 1987 look to be the same. so I will use those.
1. 1987 to 2004 mouth shapes are very different. one is very sharp.
1. The wrinkles from his ear towards his cheeks are not the same. one is present and one is not.
1. 1987 he is missing a mouth. /s
1. Wrinkle near his mouth is shown in 2004 and missing in 1987
1. 2004 ear tilts more than 1987
1. 2004 eyes are way narrower than 1987.

If you use faulty point you get a faulty outcome. Just study facial forensic techniques for 1 hour.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q