Ok, let's jump right in. This is a "What If?" scenario.

The whole Barnette/Oz thing has me very confused. She's gaining and they are both holding the lead. She is clearly feared by the Left. Oz is not. Everyone knows Oz's conflicts, yet it seems like they are trying to fabricate Barnette's?

Sound familiar?

It almost feels like Trump is running a mini-experiment.

What if the White Hats have Oz? He's free, because he gave them intel. But maybe he wasn't THAT bad and just had intel? If he wins, he can't play for the other team.

What if Barnette is the true winner? We vote her in? And she's straight MAGA (again, this is a "What if?" scenario).

This would be a WIN/WIN in that case.

Here is where it 5D's on yo shiznit:

• What does this accomplish from a MSM standpoint? They are covering the Barnette/Oz race WAY more than the competition.

• Tons of air time based on the conflicting endorsement... drawing attention to the race.

• If Barnette wins? MAJOR news coverage to say "HAHA! SEEE!? ORANGE MAN!? THEY DIDN'T FOLLOW YOU'RE ENDORSEMENT! IDIOT!"

• Trump has now successfully elected Barnette, with free Media and massive coverage. Coverage based on celebrating the fact that we didn't just blindly follow a Trump endorsement, which is actually a good thing. Lol.

• Or.... Oz wins via Trump's endorsement. Flip the MSM script on us being loyalists. But Oz is still in a checkmate from his prior crimes/intel/involvement.

Sorry for the brain dump, I was just thinking of a way Trump's confusing endorsement could somehow be a Win/Win.

Cheers!