Have you seen the information about 27 babies with a 90% mortality rate after vax? Its inaccurate and we must correct the record. Total is 270, not 27, and a 9% mortality rate. - The Great Awakening

Have you seen the information about 27 babies with a 90% mortality rate after vax? Its inaccurate and we must correct the record. Total is 270, not 27, and a 9% mortality rate. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by Shifty 2 years ago by Shifty +232 / -1

53 comments download

53 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (53)

sorted by:

▲ 16 ▼

– Shifty [S] 16 points 2 years ago +17 / -1

I know its cringe to ask, but I'm requesting a sticky so the truth can be put in front of as many eyes as possible.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 14 ▼

– BarrBQ 14 points 2 years ago +15 / -1

It's not cringe... in fact, catsfive specifically requested more sticky requests. Good work Shifty!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 9 ▼

– HOSEQ 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Which specific ""TRUTH"" are you wanting to push out there???

Is it the one where you show that your MATH SKILLS, combined with Your Reading Comprehension, are practically useless???

Or is it the one where you try to change the actual information provided???

Key Statement:::

""NO OUTCOME WAS PROVIDED FOR 238 PREGNANCIES""

This is the biggest CLUE in the whole story.....

270 MINUS 238 = 32.....

The ONLY relevant data we can work with is the 32 that IS reported.....

THAT is where you'll get your statistics......

Spontaneous Abortion -- 23

PLUS

Outcome Pending -- 5

Plus

Intrauterine Death --2

Plus

NeoNatal Death -- 1

Plus

Normal Outcome -- 1

Add them all together and you get THIRTYONE DEAD.....

But only 1 survived.....

1 Survivor = 3.125%....

This is a Gargantuan difference to your stupid 9%.....

The entire rest of the report is FLUFF, it is meaningless words to fill in the paper, and an attempt to confuse the subject, meaning it is meant to confuse YOU, not just the facts.....

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– BeyondWithin 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

This is correct. The only data there is to work with is what was reported. The unreported must not be included in the analysis because they are inconclusive.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– HOSEQ 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Thank You....

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– farpointpatriot 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Agreed

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q