Which by itself is a serious, serious problem. Not knowing the outcomes of 238 is just mind blowing. How can they not know? I have a really, really hard time believing they don't know, but rather they DO know and it makes their numbers that much worse.
9.6% is at best bare minimum. The data presents evidence for >90%. It doesn't mean the reality will be 90% but they are not wrong when they say that is what the measured data presents.
This is bad stats work as there isn’t a full data set for all 270. Claiming a 9.6% fatality rate again you don’t know the outcome of ~243 of the cases is erroneous.
Im only counting 26. (23+2+1).
Also, thats pretty fucked they dont have any idea what happened to 238 of those pregnancies.
Right, but the TOTAL of pregnancies counted is 270, so 26 fatalities out of 270 studied pregnancies = 9.6%
Which by itself is a serious, serious problem. Not knowing the outcomes of 238 is just mind blowing. How can they not know? I have a really, really hard time believing they don't know, but rather they DO know and it makes their numbers that much worse.
Have you ever not answered the phone? Do you know anything about studies?
It's actually 31 Dead out of 32....
But thanks for playing....
KNOWN outcomes should be added. I believe that is where the original poster got his number. "No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies".
We cannot assume a good outcome for all the other babies.
9.6% is at best bare minimum. The data presents evidence for >90%. It doesn't mean the reality will be 90% but they are not wrong when they say that is what the measured data presents.
This is bad stats work as there isn’t a full data set for all 270. Claiming a 9.6% fatality rate again you don’t know the outcome of ~243 of the cases is erroneous.
Is it? 10-20% miscarriage rate isn’t unexpected regardless of vaccination status.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pregnancy-loss-miscarriage/symptoms-causes/syc-20354298