Which specific ""TRUTH"" are you wanting to push out there???
Is it the one where you show that your MATH SKILLS, combined with Your Reading Comprehension, are practically useless???
Or is it the one where you try to change the actual information provided???
Key Statement:::
""NO OUTCOME WAS PROVIDED FOR 238 PREGNANCIES""
This is the biggest CLUE in the whole story.....
270 MINUS 238 = 32.....
The ONLY relevant data we can work with is the 32 that IS reported.....
THAT is where you'll get your statistics......
Spontaneous Abortion -- 23
PLUS
Outcome Pending -- 5
Plus
Intrauterine Death --2
Plus
NeoNatal Death -- 1
Plus
Normal Outcome -- 1
Add them all together and you get THIRTYONE DEAD.....
But only 1 survived.....
1 Survivor = 3.125%....
This is a Gargantuan difference to your stupid 9%.....
The entire rest of the report is FLUFF, it is meaningless words to fill in the paper, and an attempt to confuse the subject, meaning it is meant to confuse YOU, not just the facts.....
This is correct. The only data there is to work with is what was reported. The unreported must not be included in the analysis because they are inconclusive.
I know its cringe to ask, but I'm requesting a sticky so the truth can be put in front of as many eyes as possible.
Which specific ""TRUTH"" are you wanting to push out there???
Is it the one where you show that your MATH SKILLS, combined with Your Reading Comprehension, are practically useless???
Or is it the one where you try to change the actual information provided???
Key Statement:::
""NO OUTCOME WAS PROVIDED FOR 238 PREGNANCIES""
This is the biggest CLUE in the whole story.....
270 MINUS 238 = 32.....
The ONLY relevant data we can work with is the 32 that IS reported.....
THAT is where you'll get your statistics......
Spontaneous Abortion -- 23
PLUS
Outcome Pending -- 5
Plus
Intrauterine Death --2
Plus
NeoNatal Death -- 1
Plus
Normal Outcome -- 1
Add them all together and you get THIRTYONE DEAD.....
But only 1 survived.....
1 Survivor = 3.125%....
This is a Gargantuan difference to your stupid 9%.....
The entire rest of the report is FLUFF, it is meaningless words to fill in the paper, and an attempt to confuse the subject, meaning it is meant to confuse YOU, not just the facts.....
This is correct. The only data there is to work with is what was reported. The unreported must not be included in the analysis because they are inconclusive.
Thank You....