Additionally, lets say, you never have seen his nose do this with masks and therefore he is fake and that's why I should instead spend most likely over 8 hours looking at videos of him with masks on talking and analyze each and every one. (only for you to then deny again or change the subject or say "why you trying so hard?")
You have a logical conundrum
If I find a video from 2022 where its the same looking old, skinny, stretched faced-Biden wearing a mask and his nose isn't doing this, does that make the Biden in the new video real or fake? Of coarse you will still claim he is also fake in the new video.
Then if I find another video where he does have his nose bend with the mask does that mean that both these Bidens are real? You will presumably still say well then both videos show a fake Biden.
So regardless of what evidence to claim you want, in reality to can't accept that he is real. Unless you can give me a route with the data thats been provided or data that can be collected publicly, You are not actually thinking logically through each argument and considering the evidence, you are actually suffering from cognitive dissonance.
If you think you are suffering from CD, then you must be able to provide some route to convince you. otherwise, you mind is set and you are blind to any evidence to the contrary.
For me for example, I am willing to see, and analyze and discuss anything relate towards him being fake. I am open to being persuaded, and really anything could possibly convince me, if I analyze it and the data presents itself in such a way that the only conclusion is that he is fake.
An example of this: Provide two image: both with the same lighting, facial expressions, head positioning, and image quality (high). But the wrinkle map of Biden is either in consistent, or completely different. By inconsistent I mean, on 1 he has a short bridge wrinkle on his right eye and a long bridge wrinkle on his left eye, but the other image it is switch. Or simply, one where the right ear doesnt have webbing, but the face still has the right side wrinkle map (meaning it wasn't a mirrored image)
Yes like I said we all have our individualised skill sets. Yours is being like a robot. It is also very possible that your preconceived notion of you being able to approach things with an open mind and are unbiased is actually working to your deferment. If Biden is fake it mean you have been wrong with your thought processes and your stubbornness refuses to let you believe you were wrong. It's a trait and a flaw at the same time. Most times it works for your benefit, but not always.
The way I function actually doesn't place me into a corner like that. If there is evidence of him being fake, and it comes out he is, I will accept that, since the new data points show that reality. but until i see such data, I must accept the most likely and most simple probability. which is biden is not fake.
Take this example about how your approach is missing key elements to search for the truth. An intelligent person says this particular other person is going to win the jackpot lotto tomorrow. When tomorrow comes that other person wins the lotto. The next day the intelligent person makes another prediction for this new lotto drawings winner. When the numbers come. That next person wins the lotto as was predicted by the intelligent person. The intelligent person says he's a psychic. You say he's not and he has no evidence to prove it. Guess who wins: you. Nice job!
Predicting the lotto multiple times in a row has happened to people, so its entirely possible that he could predict a couple people winning and be correct without being psychic. each time he is correct, or incorrect, this would be a datapoint as to the precise accuracy of his predictions. after several predictions you could say that there is some probability that he has some method to know the outcome of the lotto to some set accuracy. him being psychic or not would not be a factor that would need to be considered or accepted.
Now a worker overhears her other coworker saying she's feeling sick. She tells her boss that she thinks this person will be sick tomorrow. The next day comes and that person calls out sick. The boss asks the employee how she knew. She says hes a psychic, You say there's no evidence of it and it's not possible. You win again!
I cannot say that there is no possibility of someone being psychic. Its just that an extraordinary claim needs extraordinary evidence.
So explain to me with evidence, what are the chances the first person picking d the lotto winner two days in a row. 1,000,000 lotto contestants for each drawing.
Its very low. i think its considered an example of a statistical impossibility. (something statistically impossible is not impossible in practice. just means a very low chance.) but its happened before. so its not impossible.
Your approach is flawed with variables that you have yet to acknowledge are key to the equation. You disregard those data points as feelings. I think your blinded by your own ego.
My approach is sound. I strictly leave out any assumptions and only have room for data that is observable. When new data is presented and observed, its added to the data and considered. If feeling were to change what is object reality, then i would need to consider feeling, but so far I have not seen evidence that they do.
Like I said no visuals needed. But just so we r clear Biden volunteered to get on the floor for a picture with some guy in an apartment who would then use the picture and say this man is a fake person who we killed and show this to the public in order to gain 15 minutes of fame. And Biden was ok with this.
I don't know if any of your claims are accurate
if the first part is accurate, i dont know if biden knew what the person would have done with the image.
If the person did say this, it doesnt make it true.
So it’s actually your technological limits that make all your arguments null & void. Obviously if they needed to fake a president they would use technology more sophisticated then what your capable of. Unplug from the matrix my brother.
If this logical fallacy is true, then you also would have no leg to stand on. There is no way optically tell he is fake as you say.
Here’s yet another piece of non evidence lol. So why are Biden and his team openly letting kids troll Biden. Appear weak when you are strong? I don’t think so. https://files.catbox.moe/eqeb80.jpeg
Where in this image does it show Biden is fake, where is the conclusive evidence? Let me guess it will have nothing to do with object reality and you will exert some sort of feelings based argument again. which has nothing to do with how one measures reality. again, look up reality-testing.
Didn’t you say that it’s very possible Biden is controlled by white hats. Yet you’re certain it’s the real Biden/ criminal pedophile right? So if it’s possible he’s being controlled by the white hats, and I’m saying he is being controlled by white hats, then you’re just pretending you don’t believe it’s very possible he’s fake.
I said Biden could be, its not something i will say is a fact since I have no evidence for it.
I am not certain he is a pedophile, it could be the case but I cannot say as a matter of fact.
I am not certain he is a criminal, I have personal feelings that he is, and there is some evidence that this is the case. However, with what is available, its not entirely conclusive. Later when more evidence comes out that can tie him as being "the big guy" it would be conclusive.
I am saying I need concrete evidence to say he is fake as a matter of fact.
So ur saying since you think he’s real that he’s just the most unaware person ever and this person became president right?
No, I am saying there is no concrete evidence he is fake.
So like when his polls were completely falling to worse ever and that same day he announced he’s running for re election. Or when he offered crack pipe health kits to promote racial equity, that didn’t backfire right? So everything always backfires on Biden because he’s just the most inept person ever who somehow all these smart evil people all rallied behind him as they covered up thier crimes. And they chose him to be the public face to conceal the dirty deeds. You’re sticking with this????????
what you are doing right now is called Straw man fallacy
Plus ur opinion is a severe minority. Read the comments on the CNBC video with the lighting you broke down. Go scroll down and look at the comments from the public opinion. It's simple, you lose. The battle of public perception and the battle for truth. NT.
Yet another logical fallacy. So a notion can only be true if it's popular?
Come on give me something concrete. What's wrong are you running out of straws?
Additionally, lets say, you never have seen his nose do this with masks and therefore he is fake and that's why I should instead spend most likely over 8 hours looking at videos of him with masks on talking and analyze each and every one. (only for you to then deny again or change the subject or say "why you trying so hard?")
You have a logical conundrum
So explain to me with evidence, what are the chances the first person picking d the lotto winner two days in a row. 1,000,000 lotto contestants for each drawing.