Why did Durham file the charges in DC? Most of the jury pool are flat out Dems or have a vested interest in keeping the Federal tax wasting system status quo. Who’s going to rock that boat? No amount of jury screening will get rid of the liberal bias that exists in Muriel Bowser’s neighborhood. A vote against Sussman would be a vote against Hillary. Ain’t gonna happen.
Each side can reject a certain number of jurors but that number is finite. In DC the population consists mainly of people employed by the federal government directly or whose job depends on the Federal Government being inefficient, lax, overspending, not changing. This best fits the Democrat party and the number of Dems to Republicans on the voter rolls are overwhelmingly Dems. Given that as the base from which to pick jurors, The chances of getting a conviction are slim at best. If 99% of the jurors are Dems who all voted for Hillary, how many would vote against her people at trial? If Durham tried Sussman in a place like Salt Lake City or Boise, ID I think the outcome would be much different. I don't know what rules are in place for federal trial venues but DC would be one of the worst to gain a conviction of Dems.
I hear you, Fren.
What time do the hangings begin?
Why did Durham file the charges in DC? Most of the jury pool are flat out Dems or have a vested interest in keeping the Federal tax wasting system status quo. Who’s going to rock that boat? No amount of jury screening will get rid of the liberal bias that exists in Muriel Bowser’s neighborhood. A vote against Sussman would be a vote against Hillary. Ain’t gonna happen.
Theory: We have to be shown without a doubt that all courts are corrupt and military is the only way.
Each side can reject a certain number of jurors but that number is finite. In DC the population consists mainly of people employed by the federal government directly or whose job depends on the Federal Government being inefficient, lax, overspending, not changing. This best fits the Democrat party and the number of Dems to Republicans on the voter rolls are overwhelmingly Dems. Given that as the base from which to pick jurors, The chances of getting a conviction are slim at best. If 99% of the jurors are Dems who all voted for Hillary, how many would vote against her people at trial? If Durham tried Sussman in a place like Salt Lake City or Boise, ID I think the outcome would be much different. I don't know what rules are in place for federal trial venues but DC would be one of the worst to gain a conviction of Dems.
Perhaps the mountain of unimpeachable evidence yet still being found innocent is supposed to cause an outrage they've already planned for.
Maybe this will all go down like it should and it will cause even more panic and show just how much control the DS has lost.
shrug maybe when the sky's the limit you can reason just about anything.
eyes on
"this is the beginning of the end for HRC/Campaign, Podesta, and more"
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE
🍿🍿
Would you say, The Walls are Closing in? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLEchPZm318
I can't wait to hear about this in the news.
Do you think this will lead into Podesta arrest announcement and Q #34? ("My fellow Americans...")
Too weaks