IS RA EL
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (83)
sorted by:
Repent means change your mind..and my comments were designed to show you you are brainwashed. If you want to stay that way. That's your choice..
The entire Bible points to Jesus.
True.
This is a strange assemblage of words.
Mauro biglino writes..book of wisdom was written at the time of Augustus immediately before the birth of Jesus..pretending here that what it says is true... The book of wisdom does not mention the crucifixion...nor does it talk of a resurrection...
Justin Martyr writes that there is no difference between Jesus and the other sons of Zeus...this in his message to the Roman emperor...."we do not bring anything new concerning those who are called sons of Zeus among you"
Although the book of wisdom is the last book in the Catholic canon it's oddly not put in that position...so the last book before the gospels does not mention anything of the annunciation of Christ...supposedly been prophesied for two thousand years and not even mentioned??Leo instead of ending with the book of wisdom it ends with malachias. malachai is treated as a person but is a messenger of the elohim
In idiah chapter 7 the verse says behold the virgin shall conceive and give birth to a son whom shexwill call Emmanuel.
In 2016 the German bishops conference finally welcomed the right translation for that particular verse...
The Hebrew term for virgin is betullah while the Hebrew term used in isiah is almah which means young girl
Do this has nothing to do with the birth of Jesus.
The Yong girl spoken of is named Abiia as is written in the second book of kings and in the second book of the chronicles and this Abiia is the wife of king Ahaz of Judea and at that time she was pregnant and about to give birth to the future king of Judea.. Hezekiah.
I hope this helps you ..if there are any sources you need to do further research into what I regard as the biggest scam in our history i will certainly help.
You would choose another man's words rather than read source. That's cool. I stand by my original statement.
What do you regard as source? A Bible which is a record of the annanuki/elohim and what happened and whose words have been shown as lies?
Mauro has traced it back to source..that's why it's called naked Bible.
I think you need to lie down
Also not canonized. The 66 books are complete...Maccabees doesn't fit. All 66 books read as though they have one Author. Maccabees and others do not. So while they may be useful for history etc.....They ARE NOT INSPIRED.
I just said..they were messengers of the elohim..that got personalised. what does not inspired mean? Do you know how many gospels how many books of the Bible didn't fit the narrative....
In the Ethiopian Coptic Bible the books of Enoch are included..in the Jewish ones they are not...I don't think you have any idea.
Let's leave it there.
You mean YHWH right? That was later translated to Yahweh, which translates closer to Joshua.
Its crazy how many fail to realize that there were no white people in the bible.
Jacob - Ya'aqov, Joseph - Yosef, Matthew - Mattiyahu, John - Yochanan, etc etc
His name is miraculous. The Son of Man.
Missed the point i guess, YHWH does not translate to jesus. Where'd they get that name from? Also YHWH had no last name.