For example:
Those are a few off the top of my head. Am I leaving any out? Please leave comments so I can cover all the bases in the coming decode.
All these are symbolic comms. They are examples of a code language that means something different. That's not to say they aren't doing this crazy stuff, but "As above, so below" applies here, so they think it will extra-dimensionally reinforce their agenda if they manifest the esoteric in the exoteric.
To clarify...
Bugs = Listening/Tracking Devices. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epNptdA4bFA
Eat the bugs, therefore, translates to: "We will put the surveillance devices inside them."
Which is their plan, talked in code, so they can say the more gruesome details out loud without the Herd freaking out.
https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/technology/innovation/technology-under-your-skin/
In Sweden, thousands have had microchips inserted into their hands. The chips are designed to speed up users’ daily routines and make their lives more convenient — accessing their homes, offices and gyms is as easy as swiping their hands against digital readers. Chips also can be used to store emergency contact details, social media profiles or e-tickets for events and rail journeys.
The one that's eluded me for a while was the beef comms.
At the moment, I figure "Synthetic Meat" is another way to suggest they are advertising replacing jobs with AI.
In terms of beef...
Cattle are informants. You get meat from cattle that can't produce milk (time-sensitive insider information / info that can translate into investment opportunities) any longer.
What does it mean to replace the Informants with Synthetic versions, milk and meat both?
I think it means replacing informants with AI. With synthetic flesh.
I'll get more into it with the decode. For now, that's what I'm working on. Give me some of your favorite NWO crazy food stories...
It's old, but the whole cholesterol thing with eggs back in the day always bugged (ahem, bothered) me. If it ties into declining fertility statistics, I'll be hornswaggled.
updoot for saying hornswaggled
Good one. I've pondered that as well.
It's a temporal thing, like coffee.
Have you noticed how about every week there is an article saying "Science shows coffee and excess caffeine is bad for you!"
Then the next week, it's "Coffee is good for you, here are 10 reasons why!"
It's temporary comms.
Coffee are the 4am talking points.
What happens if the 4am talking points need to be redacted, as they are having a negative effect on the narrative?
COFFEE BAD!
What happens when the crisis is abated, and now the 4am talking points are reliable again?
COFFEE GOOD!
Redlight / Greenlight.
Same with eggs.
Eggs are retirement funds, 401ks, pensions, etc.
"Nest Eggs"
401k investment groups are sinking!
EGG BAD!
401k investment groups are on the rise!
EGG GOOD!
Back and forth, like waves in the ocean. High tide, low tide.
Get the gist?
Oh, yeah. That's why I brought it up. But the cholesterol egg thing was a multi-year thing. So I thought if your looking for those stories, just keep it in mind. But it was old, early 90's, so maybe not right for your research topic.
No, you're right to bring it up.
Egg-White = Long Term Investment.
Egg-Yolk = Short-Term Investment.
"Egg white cholesterol is better for you!" - Translation: Invest in long-term.
"Egg yolk cholesterol is better for you!" - Translation: Invest in short-term.
Too much bad cholesterol can clog your veins. Like getting caught out when you've over-invested in a naked short.