One of the potential Jurors said that she has a strong dislike for Trump. And of course, she is on the jury.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I have a different thought. This case is such a slam dunk that Durham is flexing. He will convict their boy in their own backyard with their own biased jurors and still do it without breaking a sweat.
What will others do after that?
I think it’s a slam dunk, so he doesn’t have to worry about a tainted jury. Suss will probably wind up making a deal and flipping on the higher ups. As for the judge, he said he would recuse himself and Durham was fine with him being the judge. From the rulings I’ve read, he’s been more than fair. The accidental release of the emails could’ve been really bad for the prosecution. I found it interesting a bigger deal wasn’t made by the judge or the defense. Just one lawfags thoughts
Yeah, I get a feeling that this particular case is a much more complex piece in the 5D chess game than we think. I personally believe it serves two purposes;
Introducing evidence for other trials
Flexing against the Cabal, showing how nothing can stop what is coming.
The second aspect is far more important in the Elite world than people appreciate.
I agree. Some of the emails were kept from being introduced bc sussman wasn’t charged with conspiracy. Once he’s convicted, it opens the door to charge others with conspiracy.
Yep this is definitely the play here
Let's hope that's the case. If it is it's almost like he's putting the judicial system on trial as well. Slam dunk case with irrefutable evidence and testimony and dare them to not convict him.