Coupe of things that could add wrinkles to this. Are we talking about the President of the republic (These United States) or the corporation?
If its the corporation, then Bush did not need to keep control of it since as a corporate office holder the "president" would be following the instructions of the owners of the corporation, namely The Crown.
If it's the Republic, the bankruptcy was finalized in 1999 (70 years from 1929 when it officially became bankrupt for the Nth time). So Bush wouldn't have been the president of the republic anyways.
I personally feel that these are technical details, while interesting, does not change the outcome one way or another. Bush could very well be orchestrating crimes from behind the scenes and still be tried for treason without technically being the president (of either).
Also, there are lot of indications that Bush and Clintons were on different Cabal factions and a lot of what has happened over the decades is really the turf war between the two.
Fyi...it appears both Barbara and George gave up info and signed legacy deals so their reputations were not publicly smeared in an organized way.
Note that many of the shadow events of 2017 through 2019 appear to originate with Bushes arrest in 2017.
I strongly suspect Bushes of taking out real HRC in Sept 2016 and replacing with double in last ditch attempt to cover their tracks as she became liability, but was going to win the rigged election so they needed a body double puppet.
Still not clear if it was whitehats or blackhats treating her like a “side of beef”, but it was NOT HRC in October debate with Trump (it was “that woman”). Whitehats really had no reason to take her out since they were going to “jam” the election cheating anyway to give Trump the win in 2016.
I have no doubts that taking down Bushes was one of the first tasks, along with taking down Saudis.
I have heard HRC being replaced on Sep 11 2016, but never could believe it would be done before the elections by the white hats. This kinda makes sense.
Still, I dont think Bushes needed to replace her - unless they never planned to give her the helm in the first place. I dont buy the whole liability thing - she has always been a liability, just as much as every other Cabal pedos.
I am in two minds whether she was replaced before elections or after. Her actions on the day of the election and the days after was very much like what we would expect from the real one.
It is no accident that the attempt on Saudi “reformer” (in Las Vegas 2017), Trump visit to Saudi, and Saudi/CIA operation takedown (Nov2017?) all happened shortly after Bushes “arrested” in 2017.
Coupe of things that could add wrinkles to this. Are we talking about the President of the republic (These United States) or the corporation?
If its the corporation, then Bush did not need to keep control of it since as a corporate office holder the "president" would be following the instructions of the owners of the corporation, namely The Crown.
If it's the Republic, the bankruptcy was finalized in 1999 (70 years from 1929 when it officially became bankrupt for the Nth time). So Bush wouldn't have been the president of the republic anyways.
I personally feel that these are technical details, while interesting, does not change the outcome one way or another. Bush could very well be orchestrating crimes from behind the scenes and still be tried for treason without technically being the president (of either).
Also, there are lot of indications that Bush and Clintons were on different Cabal factions and a lot of what has happened over the decades is really the turf war between the two.
Fyi...it appears both Barbara and George gave up info and signed legacy deals so their reputations were not publicly smeared in an organized way.
Note that many of the shadow events of 2017 through 2019 appear to originate with Bushes arrest in 2017.
I strongly suspect Bushes of taking out real HRC in Sept 2016 and replacing with double in last ditch attempt to cover their tracks as she became liability, but was going to win the rigged election so they needed a body double puppet.
Still not clear if it was whitehats or blackhats treating her like a “side of beef”, but it was NOT HRC in October debate with Trump (it was “that woman”). Whitehats really had no reason to take her out since they were going to “jam” the election cheating anyway to give Trump the win in 2016.
I have no doubts that taking down Bushes was one of the first tasks, along with taking down Saudis.
I have heard HRC being replaced on Sep 11 2016, but never could believe it would be done before the elections by the white hats. This kinda makes sense.
Still, I dont think Bushes needed to replace her - unless they never planned to give her the helm in the first place. I dont buy the whole liability thing - she has always been a liability, just as much as every other Cabal pedos.
I am in two minds whether she was replaced before elections or after. Her actions on the day of the election and the days after was very much like what we would expect from the real one.
It is no accident that the attempt on Saudi “reformer” (in Las Vegas 2017), Trump visit to Saudi, and Saudi/CIA operation takedown (Nov2017?) all happened shortly after Bushes “arrested” in 2017.
Also note that Isis “terror group” destroyed AND some interesting things happening to McCain ALL in 2017! https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/342849-john-mccain-diagnosed-with-brain-cancer/
Yeah, all these were well mapped out in the early Q drops, except for the Bush part, iirc. Makes Bush a crucial piece.