That’s not an answer to my question. If you can’t explain, cite or prove your conclusions under scrutiny then we are to assume your just a fraud talking loud and saying nothing. Please enlighten us, your the one selling a product, the Bible has nothing to do with it.
So 369q are you a fraud and a grifter who tries to brow beat people to act intellectually superior?
Are you not selling the same old lies that have been before you? Please seperate yourself from all the other used car salesman
can you present details and evidence of your concluded statements? Not all of what you said is in the abstract and surely you can verify that?
You said you did plenty of studying and research please enlighten us to how you came to the conclusion that a solar flare happens 13,000 years ago and will happen again at a precise time that only you know about?
We can get into dissecting all of your philosophies and beliefs later (it’s a patchwork from various places it seems), but I can gladly show you evidence of where they originate and who began pushing those beliefs. You either already know and your whole objective is deception or you’re just gullible and a putz who thinks he’s a superior intellectual but in 6d reality he’s just getting played like a chump.
So you jump up in the town square and say here ye here ye, But then you just shut down when someone begins to investigate your claims?
Logically breaking down the things you bring up and asking for verification other than “believe me and the sentient beings I communicate with” is hardly ignorance. You have no idea at the level of understanding and knowledge I hold nor I you, which is why I am merely questioning you to gain insight into whether your claims hold any truth. So far you haven’t addressed the details of anything.
Pretty disappointing 369q, I thought with a name like that there would be more substance or that you might be able to defend your claims a little better. So basically you are a grifter is that correct?
“That Because of your ego, and your low self-esteem compared to me,”
That’s funny. Do you see the hypocrisy in that statement?
“But how can you be sure I'm not lying to you? Serving myself? You have no idea, you and other sheep look up to me for other reasons and because you think better of me than you do about yourselves.”
That’s even more hilarious! And you say you don’t have an ego their buddy?
Why do you think I asked you to present evidence to back up your claims?
You just reply with another long winded explanation that doesn’t explain anything in detail. I thought you were more intelligent than that and would reply wi TN more substance not a bunch of fluff. So let’s break down your presentation and get into the specifics.
So for instance the solar flare event. You say it happens every 13,000 years. What evidence do you have and how did you come to this conclusion? How do you know it will be controlled? And where is your evidence or proof that it will happen again to the extant of it effecting our pineal glands.
Just start there and we can begin to break down your so called truth to see if it stands up to the test. I see bullshit all over your statements, prove me wrong by being specific and start with the solar flare event.
“13.000 years" is just a point of reference meaning it was very many events ago. Time is an illusion.”
No, time is a measurement and it is finite regarding life on this planet. It is the human description of the driving mechanism of growth and decay. It is the word we have given to describe a law that governs life on earth, we are all bound to it in the flesh. Words matter and they have precise meaning.
You first make claims that are concrete and then you backtrack and say they are abstract. Many events ago? Serious?, ok, then prove that it actually happened.
Time was a "gift" given to humans after the destruction of the Ancient world on Earth (Atlantis) as a means to allow humans to organize and communicate via a meditation download roughly 6,000 years ago.
Ok, once again this is a concrete claim, show us the evidence of how you came to the conclusion that this actually happened?
“If this doesn't suit you, define how you would judge a "credible source" to trust so i can nuke it and once more prove my point on what truth truly is achieved in general (from within). Why is Person A right over person B? Science? How do you define science?”
Science is the quest for understanding of our physical realm. It’s goal is to break it down into individual pieces and dissect our natural surroundings, in order to precisely describe how things are constructed and how they operate under the laws of nature or to try and understand and investigate to define the laws themselves. Don’t confuse that with philosophy and religion, which attempts to explain why.
**The vaccine was safe and effective, all experts said. They had proof as well.
You’re joking right? You try to sound smart but the more you write the more you sound like a chump.
No, their proofs were cherry picked, obfuscated and manipulated to present the image they wanted to present. Kind of like your views and beliefs. The truth is that they’re “proofs” were purposely hidden because it showed the exact opposite of their claim. Read through what Pfizer released, they knew what the proofs added up to.
I want to believe you’re genuine and maybe you’re that delusional but you just have too much bullshit in there for me to take you serious. In conclusion if you’re responses you make yourself out to be a grifter with some bullshit theories. You should work those out, the grift would be better and more people would follow you into delusions of grandeur. It’s comical how you attack the Bible which has archaeological evidence to verify it but yet all you have is believe me because sentient beings from the 6th dimension have given me hidden knowledge during my meditations. Ok.
One question to you.
Do you know that there is a physical footprint and verifiable evidence of a man named yeshua that walked this earth? If that can be confirmed the next question is did he rise from the dead? Many people were horribly tortured not recanting that truth. That’s pretty powerful evidence. Would you be willing to be horribly tortured to preserve your testimony and the truth you present? Just curious.
That’s not an answer to my question. If you can’t explain, cite or prove your conclusions under scrutiny then we are to assume your just a fraud talking loud and saying nothing. Please enlighten us, your the one selling a product, the Bible has nothing to do with it.
So 369q are you a fraud and a grifter who tries to brow beat people to act intellectually superior?
Are you not selling the same old lies that have been before you? Please seperate yourself from all the other used car salesman
You said you did plenty of studying and research please enlighten us to how you came to the conclusion that a solar flare happens 13,000 years ago and will happen again at a precise time that only you know about?
We can get into dissecting all of your philosophies and beliefs later (it’s a patchwork from various places it seems), but I can gladly show you evidence of where they originate and who began pushing those beliefs. You either already know and your whole objective is deception or you’re just gullible and a putz who thinks he’s a superior intellectual but in 6d reality he’s just getting played like a chump.
So you jump up in the town square and say here ye here ye, But then you just shut down when someone begins to investigate your claims?
Logically breaking down the things you bring up and asking for verification other than “believe me and the sentient beings I communicate with” is hardly ignorance. You have no idea at the level of understanding and knowledge I hold nor I you, which is why I am merely questioning you to gain insight into whether your claims hold any truth. So far you haven’t addressed the details of anything.
Pretty disappointing 369q, I thought with a name like that there would be more substance or that you might be able to defend your claims a little better. So basically you are a grifter is that correct?
Another simple question to you
Do you believe in absolute truth? Or is truth relative and obscure?
“That Because of your ego, and your low self-esteem compared to me,”
That’s funny. Do you see the hypocrisy in that statement?
“But how can you be sure I'm not lying to you? Serving myself? You have no idea, you and other sheep look up to me for other reasons and because you think better of me than you do about yourselves.”
That’s even more hilarious! And you say you don’t have an ego their buddy?
Why do you think I asked you to present evidence to back up your claims?
You just reply with another long winded explanation that doesn’t explain anything in detail. I thought you were more intelligent than that and would reply wi TN more substance not a bunch of fluff. So let’s break down your presentation and get into the specifics.
So for instance the solar flare event. You say it happens every 13,000 years. What evidence do you have and how did you come to this conclusion? How do you know it will be controlled? And where is your evidence or proof that it will happen again to the extant of it effecting our pineal glands.
Just start there and we can begin to break down your so called truth to see if it stands up to the test. I see bullshit all over your statements, prove me wrong by being specific and start with the solar flare event.
“13.000 years" is just a point of reference meaning it was very many events ago. Time is an illusion.”
You first make claims that are concrete and then you backtrack and say they are abstract. Many events ago? Serious?, ok, then prove that it actually happened.
Time was a "gift" given to humans after the destruction of the Ancient world on Earth (Atlantis) as a means to allow humans to organize and communicate via a meditation download roughly 6,000 years ago.
Ok, once again this is a concrete claim, show us the evidence of how you came to the conclusion that this actually happened?
“If this doesn't suit you, define how you would judge a "credible source" to trust so i can nuke it and once more prove my point on what truth truly is achieved in general (from within). Why is Person A right over person B? Science? How do you define science?”
Science is the quest for understanding of our physical realm. It’s goal is to break it down into individual pieces and dissect our natural surroundings, in order to precisely describe how things are constructed and how they operate under the laws of nature or to try and understand and investigate to define the laws themselves. Don’t confuse that with philosophy and religion, which attempts to explain why.
**The vaccine was safe and effective, all experts said. They had proof as well.
You’re joking right? You try to sound smart but the more you write the more you sound like a chump.
No, their proofs were cherry picked, obfuscated and manipulated to present the image they wanted to present. Kind of like your views and beliefs. The truth is that they’re “proofs” were purposely hidden because it showed the exact opposite of their claim. Read through what Pfizer released, they knew what the proofs added up to.
I want to believe you’re genuine and maybe you’re that delusional but you just have too much bullshit in there for me to take you serious. In conclusion if you’re responses you make yourself out to be a grifter with some bullshit theories. You should work those out, the grift would be better and more people would follow you into delusions of grandeur. It’s comical how you attack the Bible which has archaeological evidence to verify it but yet all you have is believe me because sentient beings from the 6th dimension have given me hidden knowledge during my meditations. Ok.
One question to you.
Do you know that there is a physical footprint and verifiable evidence of a man named yeshua that walked this earth? If that can be confirmed the next question is did he rise from the dead? Many people were horribly tortured not recanting that truth. That’s pretty powerful evidence. Would you be willing to be horribly tortured to preserve your testimony and the truth you present? Just curious.