My thoughts too. Our justice system is 'supposed' to work on the merit of unbiased jurors, regardless of affiliation or past actions. A 'jury of one's peers'.
And a verdict of conviction must be given beyond a shadow of a doubt. How can that be if only moderates and conservatives are part of the jury pool as well as the judge?
Legit this is what I’m thinking. We will have to wait and see.
Absolutely agree.
My thoughts too. Our justice system is 'supposed' to work on the merit of unbiased jurors, regardless of affiliation or past actions. A 'jury of one's peers'.
And a verdict of conviction must be given beyond a shadow of a doubt. How can that be if only moderates and conservatives are part of the jury pool as well as the judge?
The evidence might be so compelling that they have to convict or out themselves as corrupt.
Time will tell.
Good luck. That would be akin to finding 3 wise men and a virgin in Ukraine.
Great point. Maybe that is why Durham didn’t challenge the Judge. I never thought of that.