If you are a Patriot, what exactly do you have against Q researchers/followers/supporters?
You think we've been duped--that Q is just a CIA psyop designed to pacify us and keep us from doing what we need to do to take our country back.
Ok, so what exactly are we NOT doing that you ARE?
Because to me, from your tone and your intensity and your rhetoric it feels an awful lot like what you're saying is that what we SHOULD be doing is grabbing our guns and storming D.C. and all our state capitols and hanging the traitors by the neck and reinstalling Trump as President.
Is that not what you're saying? If not, what ARE you saying? What makes you, as a fellow freedom loving patriot, better than us? You apparently haven't been duped. So where's your army? Why haven't you stormed the castle gates yet?
Are you suggesting that the only reason YOU haven't stormed the castle gates already is because you haven't convinced US to yet? Because from the looks of it based on the numbers on PDW vs GAW, we're definitely in the minority. If that's what you think needs to be done, what's stopping you?
Could it be because you're full of shit? You may not realize it but like half the shit you guys say over on PDW implies that you buy Q's view of the world anyway. Seems to me you're just too chicken shit to really look into Q and/or too chicken shit to align with it because you don't want to look like an idiot to your liberal masters, or you're just scared of being hurt again like we all were when the election didn't go as we hoped.
So tell me, seriously, if I'm the delusional one, what is my delusion thwarting? How is my delusion holding YOU back from doing what you so clearly want to do? What are you doing today that you think we Q followers aren't already doing? Why come here and try to get the rest of us to be as upset and panicked and miserable as you are--what's the goal exactly?
No I was just busy replying to others and yours felt convoluted so I moved on but planned to come back to it. I'll try to break it down now.
Here's the thing. I feel like if I had actually said "what's your personal issue against people" you'd have a better point that I wasn't conversing in good faith, but I thought the way I phrased it shouldn't have given you that impression. I didn't mean to imply that you had something against Q supporters PERSONALLY. I thought it was clear that you you had something against their PERSPECTIVE. Sorry for the confusion, but it really wasn't any kind of an attack. You disagree with their perspective, I'm asking why, It's that simple.
I can't argue with that. I feel the same way.
I would too. I would think any Q supporter would. Are Q supporters claiming that, or claiming to support that? I've literally never heard anything like that before so I'm not sure how else to respond.
Agreed. I don't expect anyone to accept someone else's theory without adequate proof--whatever "adequate" might mean for them personally. I'm the same way. For example, I'm not really on board with the clone thing yet. I can't say definitively that it's bullshit, but nobody has given me enough information yet to feel comfortable saying I believe it either. I haven't gotten enough evidence either way so I'm gonna stick with "It's probably just them" until someone convinces me otherwise. This seems to be the attitude of most on this site from my experience though--has it not been yours?
Again, there's nothing here I disagree with.