CHEMTRAILS🤬
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
I don't believe that any of the weather we see these days is naturally occurring. You can find the geoengineering patents online and see that they've been modifying our weather for decades. They're also using the chemtriails to create weather systems as well as spraying our forests and causing the to be more flammable (the fires in Colorado are off the charts).
They use highly toxic metals and chemicals -- you can find the data that shows the correlation between the increased use of these poisons and the increased incidence of neurological disorders (Alzheimer's, dementia, Parkinson's). The information is all there.
Those who are still denying chemtrails are no different than those who refuse to admit covid was a big scam. Just like there are whistleblower doctors and scientists speaking out about the vaccine injuries, there are educated, well respected scientists discussing geoengineering/weather modification/chemtrails. It's not conspiracy - they have scientific evidence and explanations to back it up.
A patent is only a description of a possibility or a realized invention. It is no proof of anything actually built or practiced...especially in weather modification, which requires huge distributions of seeding. The main point is that you have plenty of paranoid suspicion, but no evidence.
Toxic metals? You are aware that something like 5,200 tons of meteoric matter settles on the Earth each year. Look up the composition of meteors to find your toxic metals. This is another example of how your ignorance allows you to indulge in sheer fancy.
You don't have any evidence for "chemtrails" nor any means of identifying them as being different from contrails. Those who deny the existence of chemtrails are no different from those who deny the existence of fairy unicorns. They are not off their nut. I happen to be an aeronautical engineer with 3 degrees and 40 years experience at the world's leading manufacturer of airliners, and there is no such program being pursued. You are simply seeing contrails
What is amusing to me is that you see "chemtrails" where there is not the slightest evidence---yet ignore some actual chemical trails that exist in a very flagrant way, as exhaust plumes from large solid rocket boosters from space launches. Aluminum oxide and hydrochloric acid. Honest to God. These smoke trails are visible for many miles and linger for a long time. You guys don't care at all. You are so blinded by your obsession, you cannot recognize or react to REAL chemtrails.
The majority of the medical industry, including doctors who often have multiple degrees are the biggest players in the pandemic, no? Why do you think that is? I know - it's because they've been indoctrinated into the bullshit narrative through their higher level education.
You can have all the degrees in the world but if your degrees are influenced by the Rockefeller school system... you've been "schooled", not educated.
You've been told how to think and if anyone questions what they are observing, you mock their intelligence.
And you have no idea what it is to receive a technical education, especially at the graduate level, where original physical research is required. What, pray tell, is your academic attainment? I find it is very common that those who wish to disparage academic or other credentials do not have any to offer themselves. Kind of a "sour grapes" attitude. You gain stature by dismissing anything I might have. So, humiliate me with your more impressive background. I have been known to tip my hat properly.
I notice you have nothing to say about any of the science involved. You just want to lecture me on attitude---and you make an unsubstantiated inference about my expertise. If you are an intelligent person, let us discuss the subject and not our emotional reactions.
Which means you are indifferent to logical points. Or to relevant expertise. The key logical point in this matter is the question of evidence and even of definition. No one can state if there is any visible difference between a "chemtrail" and a contrail (at least no one has in any exchange I have had with them). There is a widespread ignorance over what contrails are and how they appear. There is a failure to understand that speculation and proposal are not evidence of activity. There are hoax videos being touted purporting to show actual chemtrail installations (I have seen such a video, and it was a thoroughgoing misrepresentation of something completely different.) There is ignorance of the fact that 52,000 tons of meteoric matter settles to Earth every year, which is an obvious source of heavy metals in the atmospheric environment. There is studied indifference to the REAL "chemtrails" produced by space launches, highly visible, and with indisputable inorganic chemical components.
Clever twist of words, but trucks are not airliners, whose basic structure has to be modified to support any spraying operations. There is no analogy, Airlines are weight-conscious and would be non-competitive if they were trying to carry extra weight for the same passenger load and range requirements as their competitors. Nobody could afford to do it and remain competitive.
I don't give any respect to people who are ignorant, yet behave like they know what they are talking about. I suppose that is Not Nice of me to be that way, but at least I do not pelt people with name-calling, which seems to be how the intellectually unprepared often end up in dialogue with me. So, if you want to talk about technical details, I am your man and I am always ready to clarify or explain what is going on.
If you are willing to believe without evidence, you don't have logical standards that are worth boasting about.