Lowered for 2 weeks from 111k to 77k in 11 days of 2 application per day. She only did one application per day this week and it went up. So to me it seems 2 per day is the key right now.
Sounds like you are trying to kill off some white blood cells because they are cancerous.
USC did a study and found that 3 days of fasting kills white blood cells. After the fast, they come back in greater numbers and stronger, and they tend to rebuild the immune system (to the extend that WBC's are part of that). Might this mean they would also be healthier cells? I don't think they looked at that.
Today's mainstream medicine discounts Warburg's work due to the fact that it does not work on ALL cancers. However, Thomas Seyfried has shown that these other cancer cells, including the blood cancers, can survive on glucose OR glutamine (an amino acid found in most foods). So, Warburg was not wrong, but he did not have the complete picture.
Once I found out about that I suspected that fasting could work, since that would deprive the body of both glucose and glutamine.
Now, Seyfried seems to be taking that approach, as well.
If I ever got cancer again, that is the approach I would take. Of course, getting an older person to go along with it is a different discussion -- nevermind the doctor who has been indoctrinated in the wrong approach.
Thank you for continuing to update us. Is there a certain WBC count that's considered a stopping point that you're aiming for?
5k to 11k is normal.
82k is not normal.
I hope that you read my previous comments. Ivermectin's half life makes it so that daily use can be dangerous.
Please read up on this. Your mother could have a setback if you rely upon this one drug alone and fail to take breaks from it.
It's not a magic bullet and cancer usually mutates to defy individual treatments.
Joe Tippens and Jane McLelland can offer you much more hope than you will find with Ivermerctin, alone.
I have not been following the story (only check in on GAW from time to time these days), but interesting if ivermectin boosted white blood count.
Lowered for 2 weeks from 111k to 77k in 11 days of 2 application per day. She only did one application per day this week and it went up. So to me it seems 2 per day is the key right now.
What is her underlying condition that you are trying to solve?
And ... are you trying to lower white blood count?
She has lukemia. Non-hodgskins lymphoma
Is it follicular lymphoma?
That's what I had.
BTW ...
Lukemia and lymphoma are not the same thing. Why do you not know this?
I just know what the paper & Dr said
Sounds like you are trying to kill off some white blood cells because they are cancerous.
USC did a study and found that 3 days of fasting kills white blood cells. After the fast, they come back in greater numbers and stronger, and they tend to rebuild the immune system (to the extend that WBC's are part of that). Might this mean they would also be healthier cells? I don't think they looked at that.
https://news.usc.edu/63669/fasting-triggers-stem-cell-regeneration-of-damaged-old-immune-system/
Otto Warburg showed more than 100 years ago that most cancer tumor cells survive on glucose. Deprive them of glucose (carbohydrates), and they die.
https://killcancercells.com/cancer-researchers/warburg/
Today's mainstream medicine discounts Warburg's work due to the fact that it does not work on ALL cancers. However, Thomas Seyfried has shown that these other cancer cells, including the blood cancers, can survive on glucose OR glutamine (an amino acid found in most foods). So, Warburg was not wrong, but he did not have the complete picture.
Once I found out about that I suspected that fasting could work, since that would deprive the body of both glucose and glutamine.
Now, Seyfried seems to be taking that approach, as well.
https://thequantifiedbody.net/water-fasts-as-a-potential-tactic-to-beat-cancer/
I also came across this NIH paper that discusses this in more detail:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493566/
If I ever got cancer again, that is the approach I would take. Of course, getting an older person to go along with it is a different discussion -- nevermind the doctor who has been indoctrinated in the wrong approach.
Best of luck.
Go back and read previous posts.