Do you have evidence for your claims of not being real and a book is fictional?
That's not how the burden of proof works, and you'd know that if you had an IQ above 80. Having said that, I sure do. Snakes cannot communicate with humans through language. Humans cannot raise from the dead. Humans cannot walk on liquid water. You cannot conjure bread or wine out of thin air. Humans could not then nor now live for several hundred years. The list goes on, this is the tip of the iceberg.
Also, do you have a source for JK Rowling "explicitly stating" that her books are fictional? Obviously, they are, I just find it hilarious that somebody like you actually forced her to clarify that 😂 I was around 8 when I first watched Harry Potter and there wasn't a question in my mind about whether or not it's made up. You were so unsure that you literally looked up a quote of Rowling having to EXPLICITLY STATE that it's fictional. That's both funny & sad.
Yes it was on the first pages of the book where it stated: :
1. Fantasy — Fiction. 2. Witches — Fiction. 3. Wizards — Fiction.
4. Schools — Fiction. 5. England — Fiction.
Now back to the point, you made a claim someone is not real and a book is fictional, without any evidence for that, and when asked refused to support the burden of proof requested. You have further made a claim of what happened a long time ago, asserted in fact, but no one can verify. While you have made further specific claims, nothing you have said yet has proven your initial claim that someone is not real and a book is fiction. Unfortunately i have to say it looks like you have no satisfactory evidence to support your initial claim, and so it can therefore be dismissed.
Insulting at this point cements that you have no evidence to support your initial claims, demonstrates bad form on your part, and signals anything further will be a waste of time (possibly tantrum-like). Best to leave it here, i've been at all levels of debate below this one, and nothing positive comes from it. But if you can get satisfactory evidence to support your initial claims i'll revisit.
That's not how the burden of proof works, and you'd know that if you had an IQ above 80. Having said that, I sure do. Snakes cannot communicate with humans through language. Humans cannot raise from the dead. Humans cannot walk on liquid water. You cannot conjure bread or wine out of thin air. Humans could not then nor now live for several hundred years. The list goes on, this is the tip of the iceberg.
Also, do you have a source for JK Rowling "explicitly stating" that her books are fictional? Obviously, they are, I just find it hilarious that somebody like you actually forced her to clarify that 😂 I was around 8 when I first watched Harry Potter and there wasn't a question in my mind about whether or not it's made up. You were so unsure that you literally looked up a quote of Rowling having to EXPLICITLY STATE that it's fictional. That's both funny & sad.
Yes it was on the first pages of the book where it stated: : 1. Fantasy — Fiction. 2. Witches — Fiction. 3. Wizards — Fiction. 4. Schools — Fiction. 5. England — Fiction.
Now back to the point, you made a claim someone is not real and a book is fictional, without any evidence for that, and when asked refused to support the burden of proof requested. You have further made a claim of what happened a long time ago, asserted in fact, but no one can verify. While you have made further specific claims, nothing you have said yet has proven your initial claim that someone is not real and a book is fiction. Unfortunately i have to say it looks like you have no satisfactory evidence to support your initial claim, and so it can therefore be dismissed.
I'm afraid you're retarded
Insulting at this point cements that you have no evidence to support your initial claims, demonstrates bad form on your part, and signals anything further will be a waste of time (possibly tantrum-like). Best to leave it here, i've been at all levels of debate below this one, and nothing positive comes from it. But if you can get satisfactory evidence to support your initial claims i'll revisit.
I've already proved ya wrong retard 😉
Also, it's not an insult, it's objectively true. I'm sorry you're easily offended!