Gee, a preliminary patent for COVID-19 testing was filed on 10-13-2015............ by Richard (Illuminati cabal) ROTHSCHILD! That's why it's called a PLAN-demic. ;-)
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200279585A1/en
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/61/a3/0d/3d91325d909386/US20200279585A1.pdf
See PAGE 1 item (60):
"Provisional application No. 62 / 240,783 , filed on Oct. 13 , 2015 ."
Source: https://truthsocial.com/@TheQhub45/posts/108334981317232910
The QHub45: https://t.me/+yYx7JGf2V_NlNTVk
They never thought she would loose. Who know what the initial plan / timeline was?
Obviously you posted your rant without even reviewing the links. If you had looked at this link that I provided:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/61/a3/0d/3d91325d909386/US20200279585A1.pdf
It says PLAIN AS DAY in this patent info - on PAGE 1 item (60):
"Provisional application No. 62 / 240,783 , filed on Oct. 13 , 2015 ."
So FUCK YOU!
Hey... I was searching for this and found your post. Thanks for posting it so long ago. Hopefully you're still around.
I have a friend asking to see this because I mentioned. Everywhere online it says it has been "debunked", which I don't believe.
But, what does "Provisional application" mean? Could Rothschild have filed this as a general technique, and then reapplied when COVID-19 was a thing? So, that's the connection? I cannot find the original patent application from 2015 that shows that it says "COVID" inside of it. And I don't understand patent connections. Thanks for any help you can provide.
Hi, thanks for your reply. The 2015 Rothschild patent application link for COVID testing that I provided (at https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/61/a3/0d/3d91325d909386/US20200279585A1.pdf ) has a section in it about a bunch of “continuations” - so it looks like there were several sequential subsequent patent applications this one is tied to.
My understanding of a “provisional patent application” is an early stage version of a device / invention that is ‘in the works’ but not fully completed yet. So someone can claim invention rights to something on a limited ‘concept’ description without having all the specifics nailed down. And I guess the subsequent patent applications tied to the initial patent application are combined as the maturity of the ‘invention’ progresses.
I am not a patents expert or any type of legal professional though, so I’m only offering my impression / opinion, not legal definitions or anything like that.
But regardless, the patent application dating back to 2015 speaks for itself, IMO.
Thanks for the further explanation. I don't think it is the smoking gun I had hoped it was. It's a process/technique, and when covid occurred they updated the patent to apply to covid. That's how I read it after your further clarification. But I'm not a patent expert, either.
That’s one way of seeing it, yes. But when it’s combined with all the other evidence (e.g., gain of function research, off-shore bioweapon labs funding with our tax dollars, billion-dollar COVID propaganda media funding with our tax dollars inside a Congressional omnibus bill, how the plan-demic was used to justify Biden not campaigning at all, derail Trump’s rallies, and enable mass election fraud via paper ballots, etc), it all piles up, IMO. There was also the finding by Glenn Beck about the 2015 agreement between Moderna and Fauci’s NIH for Coronavirus mRNA vaccine development too: https://t.me/StormIsUponUsJM/13156