It's always "Opposite Day" when it comes to the media.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Well, I’m not going to say there was no evidence. There was direct testimony from first-hand witness who claimed to have been abused. That’s actually extremely compelling evidence in almost every case. That doesn’t mean they were telling the truth, however. I am starting to lean towards the idea that he never did any of these things he was accused of. But we can’t, with any honesty or credibility, claim that there was no evidence. Eyewitness testimony is considered the best evidence of all aside from having a videotape of the crime being committed, or something similar. Eyewitness testimony has been the gold standard for a couple of centuries now.
AGAIN. Regardless of whether or not the witnesses lied or told the truth...he was accused and TRIED and covered non-stop. By now you should have learned how they cover things when they are PROTECTING their own....even when the crimes are much more obvious and much worse. He was targeted and destroyed. Look how inconsistent it all is. The justice system and the media are weaponized...to protect and destroy.