It's always "Opposite Day" when it comes to the media.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
This made me question Michael Jackson bc they hated him and tried to make him look crazy. Trust no one
Rolling Stone, of all places, had an article with compelling evidence that the first allegation against him was incredibly and absurdly false.
They showed the exact trail of how the entire affair was concocted, and why. What’s interesting about it is, I had always assumed he was guilty because he looked like a weirdo to me. Then I read the article, many years after the fact I found it in an archive somewhere. And I realized if the first accusation was false, what kind of coincidence is that then, that he actually had done that, but only to other kids.
Then I saw many people who spent many years with him putting their reputations on the line to defend him. Good people, bad people, people in between. Defending him. People who were shouted down by the same media that we know is full of shit. People who could have profited off of claiming they had been abused and selling their story, but defended him instead.
Then years later we find out that he had a very unhealthy relationship with the media because he saw them as a bunch of grifters and liars.
There is pretty compelling evidence that he had a problem with a certain group of people who do happen to, pretty much, run that same media.
It’s interesting to me that the people who’ve looked into Michael’s situation the most generally come away with the idea that perhaps he didn’t do these things. That he was just a big child himself, from years of abuse and neglect, and then what he could have seen simply as an innocent sleepover was twisted in mutated into something else by people who wanted to harm him, profit from him, etc.
It’s also interesting to me that as soon as grassroots momentum shows that people are waking up to the idea that he may have been innocent after all, then comes a documentary out of nowhere about his guilt.
Interesting.
You know your second paragraph where you say that you had always assumed he was guilty because he looked like a weirdo got me thinking. I and basically everybody else I knew thought along these same lines, he looks like a weirdo it must be true he does bad things. So what if the entire intention behind labeling him a pedophile was to create a sort of narrative that this is what a rich a pedophile looks like: some wack job weirdo that went from black to white skin, has a weird nose, and also has a literal theme park at their house. Well of course now we know that the real rich pedophile looks much more like a clean cut slick talking politician than somebody most considered a bit nutty to begin with. Who knows but if it is true that he wasn't actually a bad guy, then clearly there must be another reason.
I think the reason for the sudden pushback to say he's guilty is that the media desperately is trying to keep their ability to control the narrative. To do that they need to retain their credibility (no matter how weak we might see their credibility, it is simply a fact that your average normie doesnt question it), and if Michael Jackson not being a pedophile starts to gain traction and people begin to accept it as true it completely undermines the media's credibility because they were so blatantly 100% in on him being a bad guy. I think that's why you see them stupidly double down like this, they have lied so much and for so long they have no other choice: do nothing and hope nothing comes from it, admit to the lies, or lie some more and hope nobody notices. Obviously they always choose lie some more.
Now that we know how hard they cover for ACTUAL Pedophiles, the fact he was accused, tried, found not guilty and STILL crucified... with NO evidence... Should tell us everything.
This, they took Jackson to court with a prosecutor who was HUNGRY to be the one to put the "king of pop" in prison because of his evil nature. And they couldn't make it stick.
Jackson's big secret he was hiding is he was gay and like fucking (or maybe getting fucked by?) 20 something construction workers with big broad bodies. NOT little boys. Remember Jackson was a star of the 1980's, and I guess never dawned on him nobody cared anymore.
But then Jackson was rather insane from what his father did to him.
Jackson owned child porn. This is undeniable and depending on your frame of reference this still applies. During the 70-80s they would sell "nude children art books", which even made it to the best sellers lists. Jackson owned at least one of these according to the court documents. Which raises the question, why does a grown man own a book of naked children photographs? You can say it's from the era and everyone bought one so who cares if you want, but personally I don't approve of naked children photography books.
Not arguing your points, just adding food for thought:
Framing those you want to silence or ruin them has been a favorite tactic of [[them]] for a very long time. There is considerable evidence things can and have been planted by 3-letter agencies over the years and a plethora of examples exist to bolster this notion.
Who's to say he wasn't framed and, seeing his not backing down, assassinated him under cover of a doctor visit? 🤷♂️
Again...no evidence, not guilty and STILL crucified. Why? What was the motive to make them turn on one of their cash cows? They PROTECT THEM. Look at Elon Musk. Day after he disses Dem party, he's a rapist. THE NEXT DAY.
What mainstream media outlet told you he had k porn? Look, maybe he did. He might damn well be guilty and a piece of shit.
But if the idea is he was set up by the media to take the fall, what’s one more lie on top of all of the other ones?
The only thing I’m certain of is that the original accuser made everything up and his father was responsible. It’s incredibly clear that it was the case, even based on their own shitty testimony. And if the original accuser, that got the entire ball rolling, was lying from the start, it makes me question everyone that comes after him.
What an amazing coincidence it would be that this man was falsely accused of molesting children and actually DID turn out to be a real child molester! Even though many of the children that stayed the night with him never reported anything out of the ordinary except that he was, basically, an adult child himself.
The thing about it is, he’s a weirdo. I wouldn’t doubt for a second that someone who looks like that, and talks like that, and behaves like that, was deeply mentally ill and/or disturbed. He clearly wasn’t a normal human being. It’s obvious to everyone. If you came out tomorrow and proved to me that he did this, I believe it. But we know for goddamn sure the media loves to cover for pedophiles. They didn’t cover for him.
He went out of his way to accuse those “certain people“ who run the media of running the media. He accused those exact people of stabbing him in the back, he exposed those exact people for their bullshit. And then, presto, he’s a child molester.
I have no idea if he did those things. But it wouldn’t shock me at all to find out he was set up. A lot of those interviews have disappeared over the years, but quite a few people close to him directly blame those “certain people“ that Michael himself had pointed the finger out. You know… Those people who, even today, destroy your life if you criticize him? He was the biggest star in the world pointing a direct finger at those very people.
There isn’t even a celebrity today half as famous or beloved as Michael was at his peak. Go ahead and name one. At his peak, he’s only comparable to Elvis, the Beatles, and maybe one or two others over the last 100 years. And he was pointing a finger directly, unflinchingly, at those people.
It makes you think.
Well, I’m not going to say there was no evidence. There was direct testimony from first-hand witness who claimed to have been abused. That’s actually extremely compelling evidence in almost every case. That doesn’t mean they were telling the truth, however. I am starting to lean towards the idea that he never did any of these things he was accused of. But we can’t, with any honesty or credibility, claim that there was no evidence. Eyewitness testimony is considered the best evidence of all aside from having a videotape of the crime being committed, or something similar. Eyewitness testimony has been the gold standard for a couple of centuries now.
AGAIN. Regardless of whether or not the witnesses lied or told the truth...he was accused and TRIED and covered non-stop. By now you should have learned how they cover things when they are PROTECTING their own....even when the crimes are much more obvious and much worse. He was targeted and destroyed. Look how inconsistent it all is. The justice system and the media are weaponized...to protect and destroy.