COVID 2.0 er attack on da family?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Blaming vaxx adverse effects on falsely-accused sexual infidelity? Yeah, the globalists are that scummy. Good call, OP
In a different sense, vaxxers really were unfaithful, though. Maybe not unfaithful to their marriage vow of sexual monogamy, but lacking faith in God to protect their health. If my spouse got vaxxed behind my back, I would feel cheated on.
Faith in God to protect your health? Who told you God does that for you? It's your body..your responsibility..feed it properly..no junk food..examine ingredients..cook fresh food..keep body clean..keep mind clean.. exercise in moderation..sleep. last you a lifetime
da, dat, dey, dis
Homie got da beatbox going 🤣😂🤣
https://truthsocial.com/@TroofSeekerz/108346696527059316
Well dis es cucked AF ..... TruthSocial has taken me post down
Could you please upload the images to catbox or elsewhere, and share the two URLs here?
https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8;jsessionid=9DBF5262740CD03D2C9E0F96E0F7
link to vaers
https://twitter.com/Yolo304741/status/1528151542854983686
link showing rehash of old photos
I'll see wut I can do wif pics
Thank you.
Is the top left image is a table from VAERS?
Yes and me imgur account acting stupid but just search da COVID vaccine and scroll down to the B's ...... Blisters, Rupturing Blisters and Infected Blisters happened in like 52% of the patients combined ... just regular blisters in 50%
Got it, thank you.
So this is what I see:
https://files.catbox.moe/io57im.png
https://files.catbox.moe/d8fdvk.png
For regular blisters, it's ~0.6.
The 0.6 isn't the fraction, rather, a percent, as far as I can tell.
Though, anecdotally, I believe ~0.6% might be too low.
I know of one local small town, which had a large percentage of their town break out in blistering after the jabs.
Dat taint right brah .... lemme see wut i can do