In rebuke to Pentagon, Navy board finds 3-0 for vax objector amid questions of mandate's lawfulness. In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon, a Navy administrative separation board voted unanimously to retain an officer who refused to comply with the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. - The Great Awakening

In rebuke to Pentagon, Navy board finds 3-0 for vax objector amid questions of mandate's lawfulness. In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon, a Navy administrative separation board voted unanimously to retain an officer who refused to comply with the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. (justthenews.com) ⚠️ Vax-WINNING 👌

posted 2 years ago by purkiss80 2 years ago by purkiss80 +370 / -0

24 comments

24 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (24)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Monomial 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

And the real question is, what do they mean when they say "President". Do they mean Biden, or do they mean the Commander-In-Chief? And who would they recognize as the legitimate Commander-In-Chief for an order like this? Perhaps there is a reason Biden didn't try and order it directly...

permalink save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +5 / -1

▲ 1 ▼

– VetforTrump 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

He has no military. That is still with the people via trump. Soon to be used on them.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– Hand_Of_Node 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

That's just a TDS+ sufferer.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q